Comparison Overview

Business Review

VS

ABA Journal

Business Review

Strada Stirbei Voda 58, Sector 1, 010104, RO
Last Update: 2025-11-26

With 25 years of experience, Business Review has truly become the platform Where Romania Talks Business, reaching both local and international audience, being the first English-language publication on the Romanian market. Each month Business Review magazine delivers news, reviews, research, comments and business analyzes by inspirational and high impact editorial content that will take your business to the next level. It is a must-read that focuses on all issues relevant to CEOs, business owners and executives of all types of companies. Monthly magazine | Online News | BR Daily newsletter | Special Supplements & Guides | Events

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ABA Journal

321 N. Clark St., Chicago, 60654, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

We're the flagship magazine of the American Bar Association, covering the trends, people and finances of the legal profession from Wall Street to Main Street to Pennsylvania Avenue. Our website is updated with breaking legal news throughout every business day, and our monthly magazine is read by half the nation's 1.1 million lawyers. We welcome comments and news tips, inquiries from advertisers, and requests to subscribe to the magazine. www.abajournal.com

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 466
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/business-review.jpeg
Business Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aba-journal.jpeg
ABA Journal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Business Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ABA Journal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Business Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABA Journal in 2025.

Incident History — Business Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Business Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ABA Journal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABA Journal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/business-review.jpeg
Business Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aba-journal.jpeg
ABA Journal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ABA Journal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Business Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ABA Journal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Business Review company.

In the current year, ABA Journal company and Business Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ABA Journal company nor Business Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ABA Journal company nor Business Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ABA Journal company nor Business Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Business Review company nor ABA Journal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Business Review nor ABA Journal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Business Review company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ABA Journal company.

ABA Journal company employs more people globally than Business Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Business Review nor ABA Journal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Business Review nor ABA Journal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Business Review nor ABA Journal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Business Review nor ABA Journal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Business Review nor ABA Journal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Business Review nor ABA Journal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.