Comparison Overview

Business for Scotland

VS

Resources for the Future

Business for Scotland

290 Bath Street, Glasgow, Scotland, G2 4JR, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.BusinessforScotland.co.uk

Business for Scotland is a campaigning business network and think tank. We are a passionate about unlocking Scotland’s potential by promoting policies that will create sustainable business and economic growth. We are dedicated supporters of Scottish independence as a means to deliver our goals, setting Scotland on a more inclusive, greener, confident, more equal and economically successful path.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Resources for the Future

1616 P St. NW, Washington, DC, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rff.org

Resources for the Future improves environmental, energy, and natural resource decisions through impartial economic research and policy engagement. RFF is committed to being the most widely trusted source of research insights and policy solutions leading to a healthy environment and a thriving economy. RFF is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt nonprofit organization that operates according to four core values: BALANCE: RFF focuses on improving both environmental and economic outcomes. INDEPENDENCE: RFF is nonpartisan and its research is nonproprietary and publicly available. RIGOR: RFF adheres to the highest scientific and professional standards. RESULTS: RFF’s work leads to better decisions.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 142
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/business-for-scotland.jpeg
Business for Scotland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resources-for-the-future.jpeg
Resources for the Future
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Business for Scotland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Resources for the Future
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Business for Scotland in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Resources for the Future in 2025.

Incident History — Business for Scotland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Business for Scotland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Resources for the Future (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Resources for the Future cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/business-for-scotland.jpeg
Business for Scotland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resources-for-the-future.jpeg
Resources for the Future
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Resources for the Future company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Business for Scotland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Resources for the Future company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Business for Scotland company.

In the current year, Resources for the Future company and Business for Scotland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Resources for the Future company nor Business for Scotland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Resources for the Future company nor Business for Scotland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Resources for the Future company nor Business for Scotland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Business for Scotland company nor Resources for the Future company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Resources for the Future holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Business for Scotland company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Resources for the Future company.

Resources for the Future company employs more people globally than Business for Scotland company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Resources for the Future holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Resources for the Future holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Resources for the Future holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Resources for the Future holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Resources for the Future holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Resources for the Future holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References