Comparison Overview

Business for Scotland

VS

Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA)

Business for Scotland

290 Bath Street, Glasgow, Scotland, G2 4JR, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Business for Scotland is a campaigning business network and think tank. We are a passionate about unlocking Scotland’s potential by promoting policies that will create sustainable business and economic growth. We are dedicated supporters of Scottish independence as a means to deliver our goals, setting Scotland on a more inclusive, greener, confident, more equal and economically successful path.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA)

1010, AT
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

The Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) was established in October 2007. The founding of the European branch of the Liechtenstein Institute expanded upon the success of the Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination (LISD) of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University. The goal of LIVA is to become a bridgehead organization between Austria, Europe, the United States and the Middle East. Through its work on conflict management, intercultural and inter-religious dialogue, and state- and security-building issues, LIVA works to find a modus vivendi between various cultures, religions, ethnicities and political groups. LIVA is an independent, non-partisan and nonprofit organization.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/business-for-scotland.jpeg
Business for Scotland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/liechtenstein-institute-in-vienna-austria-liva-.jpeg
Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Business for Scotland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Business for Scotland in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) in 2025.

Incident History — Business for Scotland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Business for Scotland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/business-for-scotland.jpeg
Business for Scotland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/liechtenstein-institute-in-vienna-austria-liva-.jpeg
Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Business for Scotland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Business for Scotland company.

In the current year, Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company and Business for Scotland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company nor Business for Scotland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company nor Business for Scotland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company nor Business for Scotland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Business for Scotland company nor Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Business for Scotland company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) company.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Liechtenstein Institute in Vienna, Austria (LIVA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X