Comparison Overview

Business for Scotland

VS

Global CCS Institute

Business for Scotland

290 Bath Street, Glasgow, Scotland, G2 4JR, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.BusinessforScotland.co.uk

Business for Scotland is a campaigning business network and think tank. We are a passionate about unlocking Scotland’s potential by promoting policies that will create sustainable business and economic growth. We are dedicated supporters of Scottish independence as a means to deliver our goals, setting Scotland on a more inclusive, greener, confident, more equal and economically successful path.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Global CCS Institute

360 Elizabeth St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://globalccsinstitute.com

Our mission is to accelerate the deployment and commercial viability of carbon capture and storage (CCS) globally. The Global CCS Institute is the world’s leading authority on carbon capture and storage (CCS) – an international climate change organisation whose mission is to accelerate the deployment of CCS as an imperative technology in tackling climate change and providing energy security. With a team of nearly 50 professionals working with and on behalf of our Members, we drive the adoption of CCS as quickly and cost effectively as possible by sharing expertise, building capacity and providing information, advocacy and advice to ensure this clean technology can play its vital role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Our diverse international membership includes governments, global corporations, private companies, research bodies and non-governmental organisations; all of whom are committed to CCS as an integral part of a clean energy future. We are headquartered in Melbourne, Australia with offices in Washington DC, Brussels, Beijing, Tokyo and Abu Dhabi.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/business-for-scotland.jpeg
Business for Scotland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-ccs-institute.jpeg
Global CCS Institute
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Business for Scotland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Global CCS Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Business for Scotland in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global CCS Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Business for Scotland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Business for Scotland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Global CCS Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global CCS Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/business-for-scotland.jpeg
Business for Scotland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-ccs-institute.jpeg
Global CCS Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Global CCS Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Business for Scotland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Global CCS Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Business for Scotland company.

In the current year, Global CCS Institute company and Business for Scotland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Global CCS Institute company nor Business for Scotland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Global CCS Institute company nor Business for Scotland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Global CCS Institute company nor Business for Scotland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Business for Scotland company nor Global CCS Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Global CCS Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Business for Scotland company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Global CCS Institute company.

Global CCS Institute company employs more people globally than Business for Scotland company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Global CCS Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Global CCS Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Global CCS Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Global CCS Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Global CCS Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Business for Scotland nor Global CCS Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References