Comparison Overview

Business Alternatives, Inc

VS

Rolling Thunder

Business Alternatives, Inc

US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Established February 2002 in New York City, Business Alternatives has been servicing varying types of businesses with document management solutions, data entry outsourcing and custom solutions that save time and money across the enterprise. Customer Service, Security and the relationship that we establish with our clients is of the utmost importance. We at Business Alternatives feel we work with your business not just for it and together we are striving to create a seamless feel to your data. Business Alternatives currently services companies that have thousands of employees across multiple worksites across the country as well as dozens of single person, home-based businesses.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rolling Thunder

772 King Street West, Hamilton, L8S 1K1, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Rolling Thunder Inc. is a consulting and value added reseller firm located in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. We have grown exponentially since our inception in 1990. We specialize in many areas of technology including local, wide and wireless area networking, business server, laptop and workstation sales, telephony, dictation and transcription systems, PDAs, document imaging and management, as well as training in all of these and other areas.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Business Alternatives, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rolling-thunder.jpeg
Rolling Thunder
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Business Alternatives, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rolling Thunder
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Business Alternatives, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rolling Thunder in 2025.

Incident History — Business Alternatives, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Business Alternatives, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rolling Thunder (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rolling Thunder cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Business Alternatives, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rolling-thunder.jpeg
Rolling Thunder
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Business Alternatives, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rolling Thunder company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rolling Thunder company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Business Alternatives, Inc company.

In the current year, Rolling Thunder company and Business Alternatives, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rolling Thunder company nor Business Alternatives, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rolling Thunder company nor Business Alternatives, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rolling Thunder company nor Business Alternatives, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Business Alternatives, Inc company nor Rolling Thunder company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Business Alternatives, Inc nor Rolling Thunder holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rolling Thunder company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Business Alternatives, Inc company.

Rolling Thunder company employs more people globally than Business Alternatives, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Business Alternatives, Inc nor Rolling Thunder holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Business Alternatives, Inc nor Rolling Thunder holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Business Alternatives, Inc nor Rolling Thunder holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Business Alternatives, Inc nor Rolling Thunder holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Business Alternatives, Inc nor Rolling Thunder holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Business Alternatives, Inc nor Rolling Thunder holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.