Comparison Overview

Bury & Walkers LLP

VS

Simplify

Bury & Walkers LLP

Regent Street, Barnsley, South Yorkshire, S70 2EQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Bury & Walkers are one of the leading firms of solicitors in Yorkshire, and provide expert, affordable legal advice and support to individuals and businesses in the UK and overseas, from our offices in Leeds, Barnsley and Dearne Valley Why choose Bury & Walkers? We have over 160 years of experience in providing legal support to all manner of individual and business clients. In the last three years alone we’ve acted on behalf of almost 9,000 clients, from across the Yorkshire region and beyond, who value our high level of service and our responsive and pro-active support and advice. It’s for these reasons that many clients return to us for legal guidance time and time again. With 30 legal professionals operating from our offices in Leeds, Barnsley and Dearne Valley, we’re large enough to offer clients specialist legal help when required, yet small enough to retain the personal touch at realistic and competitive fee levels. We have been awarded the Lexcel practice management standard by the Law Society that demonstrates our commitment to provide the best customer service.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Simplify

5 Barton Close, Leicester, LE19 1SJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Simplify was created in March 2019 by combining two of the largest players in the property market: My Home Move and The Simplify Group. The group combines ground-breaking technology with talented people and incorporates many of the fastest-growing, most innovative brands within the industry, including Advantage Property Lawyers, DC Law, JS Law, Move with Us, My Home Move, Gordon Brown Law, Moving Made Easy and Cook Taylor Woodhouse Spanning 8 UK sites and employing over 1,500 people, the group processed or panelled over 130,000 conveyancing completions in 2018, making it the UK’s leading conveyancing business,

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 435
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bury-&-walkers-llp.jpeg
Bury & Walkers LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/simplifyuk.jpeg
Simplify
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bury & Walkers LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Simplify
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bury & Walkers LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Simplify in 2025.

Incident History — Bury & Walkers LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bury & Walkers LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Simplify (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Simplify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bury-&-walkers-llp.jpeg
Bury & Walkers LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/simplifyuk.jpeg
Simplify
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Simplify company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bury & Walkers LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Simplify company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bury & Walkers LLP company has not reported any.

In the current year, Simplify company and Bury & Walkers LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Simplify company nor Bury & Walkers LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Simplify company nor Bury & Walkers LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Simplify company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Bury & Walkers LLP company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP company nor Simplify company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Simplify holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP company nor Simplify company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Simplify company employs more people globally than Bury & Walkers LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Simplify holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Simplify holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Simplify holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Simplify holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Simplify holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Simplify holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X