Comparison Overview

Bury & Walkers LLP

VS

Altman & Altman, LLP

Bury & Walkers LLP

Regent Street, Barnsley, South Yorkshire, S70 2EQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Bury & Walkers are one of the leading firms of solicitors in Yorkshire, and provide expert, affordable legal advice and support to individuals and businesses in the UK and overseas, from our offices in Leeds, Barnsley and Dearne Valley Why choose Bury & Walkers? We have over 160 years of experience in providing legal support to all manner of individual and business clients. In the last three years alone we’ve acted on behalf of almost 9,000 clients, from across the Yorkshire region and beyond, who value our high level of service and our responsive and pro-active support and advice. It’s for these reasons that many clients return to us for legal guidance time and time again. With 30 legal professionals operating from our offices in Leeds, Barnsley and Dearne Valley, we’re large enough to offer clients specialist legal help when required, yet small enough to retain the personal touch at realistic and competitive fee levels. We have been awarded the Lexcel practice management standard by the Law Society that demonstrates our commitment to provide the best customer service.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Altman & Altman, LLP

675 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Altman & Altman LLP is a Massachusetts Law Firm that has been representing clients throughout the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for the past 45 years. The firm concentrates its practice on Personal Injury cases, Criminal Defense, and Criminal Appeals. Our team has successfully litigated tens of millions of dollars in personal injury settlements and verdicts for our clients. At Altman & Altman LLP, the personalized attention along with exceptional results each client receives has been the foundation of our success. We pride ourselves in our attention to detail and creative solutions, to ensure we have pursued all avenues for a successful verdict. Personal Injury | Criminal Defense | General Practice

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bury-&-walkers-llp.jpeg
Bury & Walkers LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/altman-&-altman-llp.jpeg
Altman & Altman, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bury & Walkers LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Altman & Altman, LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bury & Walkers LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Altman & Altman, LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Bury & Walkers LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bury & Walkers LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Altman & Altman, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Altman & Altman, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bury-&-walkers-llp.jpeg
Bury & Walkers LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/altman-&-altman-llp.jpeg
Altman & Altman, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bury & Walkers LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Altman & Altman, LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Altman & Altman, LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bury & Walkers LLP company.

In the current year, Altman & Altman, LLP company and Bury & Walkers LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Altman & Altman, LLP company nor Bury & Walkers LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Altman & Altman, LLP company nor Bury & Walkers LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Altman & Altman, LLP company nor Bury & Walkers LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP company nor Altman & Altman, LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Altman & Altman, LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP company nor Altman & Altman, LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bury & Walkers LLP company employs more people globally than Altman & Altman, LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Altman & Altman, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Altman & Altman, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Altman & Altman, LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Altman & Altman, LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Altman & Altman, LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bury & Walkers LLP nor Altman & Altman, LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X