Comparison Overview

Burris & Schoenberg, LLP

VS

MRC Group

Burris & Schoenberg, LLP

US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Burris & Schoenberg, LLP offers comprehensive civil litigation and transactional experience, including civil trials, arbitrations, mediations, appeals, real estate, entertainment, and commercial transactions law. Our attorneys have practiced before state and federal courts throughout the State of California, as well as before the United States Supreme Court and in other jurisdictions. Our offices are located in Wilshire-Bundy Plaza, on the north-west corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Bundy Drive in Brentwood, West Los Angeles.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MRC Group

Earle House, Atlantic Street, Broadheath, Altrincham, GB, WA14 5DD
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

𝗪𝗲𝗹𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗠𝗥𝗖 𝗚𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗥𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. With over 20 years of experience, we are a nationally recognised, award-winning provider of medical record services for the medico-legal sector. Our rebrand reflects our evolution while staying true to the values that define us: 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝗦𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲, 𝗜𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁. MRC Group unites our full suite of expert services: 🤖 MRC Ai – Award-winning AI-driven collation 🩺 MRC Screening – Informed case assessment and screening 📄 MRC Pagination – Expert chronology and pagination 🩻 MRC Radiology – Integrated diagnostic reporting 🔐 MRC Portal – Secure access and document sharing 🎓 MRC Training – CPD-accredited learning for legal teams Our in-house clinical team, secure tech platforms, and partnerships with industry leaders ensure we deliver responsive, accurate and efficient support to clinical negligence, personal injury, and child protection cases across the UK. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗥𝗖 𝘄𝗮𝘆.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Burris & Schoenberg, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mrc-group-uk.jpeg
MRC Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Burris & Schoenberg, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MRC Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burris & Schoenberg, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MRC Group in 2025.

Incident History — Burris & Schoenberg, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burris & Schoenberg, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MRC Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MRC Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Burris & Schoenberg, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mrc-group-uk.jpeg
MRC Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Burris & Schoenberg, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MRC Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MRC Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Burris & Schoenberg, LLP company.

In the current year, MRC Group company and Burris & Schoenberg, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MRC Group company nor Burris & Schoenberg, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MRC Group company nor Burris & Schoenberg, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MRC Group company nor Burris & Schoenberg, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Burris & Schoenberg, LLP company nor MRC Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Burris & Schoenberg, LLP nor MRC Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Burris & Schoenberg, LLP company nor MRC Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MRC Group company employs more people globally than Burris & Schoenberg, LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Burris & Schoenberg, LLP nor MRC Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Burris & Schoenberg, LLP nor MRC Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Burris & Schoenberg, LLP nor MRC Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Burris & Schoenberg, LLP nor MRC Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Burris & Schoenberg, LLP nor MRC Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Burris & Schoenberg, LLP nor MRC Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X