Comparison Overview

Burns & McDonnell

VS

GMR Group

Burns & McDonnell

undefined, Kansas City, MO, 64114, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

At Burns & McDonnell, our engineers, construction professionals, architects, planners, technologists and scientists do more than plan, design and construct. With a mission unchanged since 1898 — make our clients successful — we partner with you on the toughest challenges, constantly working to make the world an amazing place. Each professional brings an ownership mentality to projects at our 100% employee-owned firm, which has safety performance among the top 5% of AEC firms. As dedicated owners, we work through challenges until they’re resolved, meeting or exceeding our clients’ goals. We apply this commitment to our communities, too. We live and work in the same cities you call home, so we share a passion to keep them strong and healthy. From fundraising events and community cleanups to educational outreach and mentorship — especially when it comes to sharing our passion for STEM — our professionals work to make our communities thrive.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 14,158
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GMR Group

New Udaan Bhawan, New Delhi, Delhi, 110037, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

GMR Group is a leading global infrastructure conglomerate with significant expertise in airports, energy, transportation, and urban infrastructure. GMR Airports is Asia’s largest private airport operator with the world’s 2nd largest passenger handling capacity (over 100 million annually). It operates key airports like Delhi, India’s largest and fastest-growing airport, Hyderabad, an innovative greenfield airport, and New Goa, India's first destination airport. Expanding its overseas footprint, the company is developing Kualanamu International Airport in Medan, Indonesia, (with Angkasa Pura II) and provides technical services to the renowned Mactan Cebu International in the Philippines. The Group is also currently developing two major greenfield airport projects in India and Greece. As a pioneer in implementing the path-breaking Aerotropolis concept in India, GMR Airports is also developing unique airport cities around its airports in Delhi, Hyderabad, and Goa. GMR Aero Technic is India’s largest integrated world-class third-party MRO and provides complete technical support to aircraft operators. GMR’s energy businesses have an installed capacity of over 3,000 MW capacity. With a significant focus on green energy, the company fosters sustainability by harnessing the power of wind, water, and sun for energy generation. The Transportation and Urban Infrastructure division focuses on surface transport projects including Roads, Railways, and Airstrips/ Runways. The Group’s EPC business is working on the design and construction of the prestigious Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor project of DFCCI (Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India). GMR Group is also developing a multi-focus Special Investment Region in Tamil Nadu. The GMR Varalakshmi Foundation, the group's CSR arm, aims to enhance people's lives by improving skills, education, and healthcare infrastructure, fostering a better quality of life generally wherever the Group has business presence.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 16,159
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burns-&-mcdonnell.jpeg
Burns & McDonnell
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gmr-group.jpeg
GMR Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Burns & McDonnell
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GMR Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burns & McDonnell in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GMR Group in 2025.

Incident History — Burns & McDonnell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burns & McDonnell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GMR Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GMR Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burns-&-mcdonnell.jpeg
Burns & McDonnell
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gmr-group.jpeg
GMR Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GMR Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Burns & McDonnell company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GMR Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Burns & McDonnell company.

In the current year, GMR Group company and Burns & McDonnell company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GMR Group company nor Burns & McDonnell company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GMR Group company nor Burns & McDonnell company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GMR Group company nor Burns & McDonnell company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Burns & McDonnell company nor GMR Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Burns & McDonnell nor GMR Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GMR Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Burns & McDonnell company.

GMR Group company employs more people globally than Burns & McDonnell company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither Burns & McDonnell nor GMR Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Burns & McDonnell nor GMR Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Burns & McDonnell nor GMR Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Burns & McDonnell nor GMR Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Burns & McDonnell nor GMR Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Burns & McDonnell nor GMR Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H