Comparison Overview

BURNIE CITY COUNCIL

VS

Strategic Partnerships, Inc.

BURNIE CITY COUNCIL

80 WILSON ST, BURNIE, TAS 7320, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Burnie is Tasmania’s most westerly city, located on the North West Coast about 40 minutes from Devonport. We have a northerly aspect and are nestled around Emu Bay on Bass Strait. We are a vibrant, thriving beautiful place; a caring community; a regional leader engaged with the world and a city that lives its dreams. Our 20,000 residents enjoy a vibrant shopping district that spills onto the beach for seafood and coffee. Burnie has surprising restaurants and cafes to linger in. And a dynamic cultural life, galleries, performances, exhibitions and community events. Fantastic food is made in Burnie like whisky and cheese. The best milk in the world for cheese making is produced in the area. There are well stocked deli’s to tempt you with gourmet treats. Burnie's hills hide impressive gardens and parks, and it is surrounded by beautiful beaches, sparkling water and fresh air. To find out more about Burnie visit www.discoverburnie.net

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Strategic Partnerships, Inc.

7500 Rialto Boulevard, Austin, Texas, 78735, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Strategic Partnerships, Inc. (SPI) is a nationally recognized leader in public sector business development and procurement consulting. Since 1995, SPI's team of 200+ former government executives have provided unmatched expertise and a comprehensive suite of services to help businesses of all sizes navigate the complexities of government procurement at various levels and expand their reach in the public sector. With a proven track record of success, SPI is trusted by seasoned government contractors working to grow market share and by businesses new to the government marketplace. Our unique approach combines industry insights with hands-on experience to deliver results-driven strategies, including expertise in Public-Private Partnerships (P3s). Explore how SPI can support your business growth and success at www.spartnerships.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burnie-city-council.jpeg
BURNIE CITY COUNCIL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strategic-partnerships-inc..jpeg
Strategic Partnerships, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BURNIE CITY COUNCIL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Strategic Partnerships, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BURNIE CITY COUNCIL in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Strategic Partnerships, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — BURNIE CITY COUNCIL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BURNIE CITY COUNCIL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Strategic Partnerships, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Strategic Partnerships, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burnie-city-council.jpeg
BURNIE CITY COUNCIL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/strategic-partnerships-inc..jpeg
Strategic Partnerships, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both BURNIE CITY COUNCIL company and Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BURNIE CITY COUNCIL company.

In the current year, Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company and BURNIE CITY COUNCIL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company nor BURNIE CITY COUNCIL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company nor BURNIE CITY COUNCIL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company nor BURNIE CITY COUNCIL company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BURNIE CITY COUNCIL company nor Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BURNIE CITY COUNCIL nor Strategic Partnerships, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BURNIE CITY COUNCIL company nor Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Strategic Partnerships, Inc. company employs more people globally than BURNIE CITY COUNCIL company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither BURNIE CITY COUNCIL nor Strategic Partnerships, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BURNIE CITY COUNCIL nor Strategic Partnerships, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BURNIE CITY COUNCIL nor Strategic Partnerships, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BURNIE CITY COUNCIL nor Strategic Partnerships, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BURNIE CITY COUNCIL nor Strategic Partnerships, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BURNIE CITY COUNCIL nor Strategic Partnerships, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N