Comparison Overview

Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP

VS

Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC

Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP

2400, 525 8 Ave SW, Calgary, T2P 1G1, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The world is changing, and it’s happening faster than ever. Businesses and people are adapting, but nobody can do it alone. Maybe it’s easier for us to keep up because we’ve always been nimble and brought creative thinking to the way we practise law. BD&P is a full-service boutique law firm headquartered in Calgary, Canada. Our approximately 120 lawyers are bright, deeply talented legal minds who work on a broad spectrum of corporate and litigation matters, sitting across the table from national and international firms. Our clients live a variety of sectors, including energy, renewables, agribusiness, technology and life sciences. We are not just legal advisors, we are true partners. We've been called unconventional, and we think that makes us better partners to our clients for now — and for the future.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 261
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC

517 Court Place, Pittsburgh, 15219, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC was started in 2013 by Sheila Burke, John Cromer and Michael Cremonese, all former partners at a top ten law firm in Pittsburgh. Joined by associate Katherine Wrenshall, BCC offers a full range of litigation and business law services and represents individuals, small businesses and corporations. BCC is based in downtown Pittsburgh.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burnet-duckworth-&-palmer-llp.jpeg
Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burke-cromer-cremonese-llc.jpeg
Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burnet-duckworth-&-palmer-llp.jpeg
Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burke-cromer-cremonese-llc.jpeg
Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP company.

In the current year, Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC company and Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC company nor Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC company nor Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC company nor Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP company nor Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP nor Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP company nor Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP company employs more people globally than Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP nor Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP nor Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP nor Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP nor Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP nor Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP nor Burke Cromer Cremonese, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X