Comparison Overview

Burner Systems International

VS

Rubin LLC

Burner Systems International

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Burner Systems International was acquired by Robertshaw in 2016 and is now part of Robertshaw. BSI designs, develops and manufactures components for gas appliance OEMs. This acquisition complements Robertshaw's market leading gas products business and creates the most comprehensive portfolio of gas delivery products and systems for the appliance and commercial original equipment manufacturers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rubin LLC

Volgogradskiy prospekt, b.47, of.616, Moscow, RU, 109316
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Rubin LLC is an engineering company that works in the field of high-tech engineering, including semiconductor industry, biopharmaceutical, food industry etc. Rubin LLC is an unique experience of the implementation of the international design approach to the projects, located in Russia Rubin LLC is a company, that can provide turnkey design solutions

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burner-systems-international.jpeg
Burner Systems International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rubin-llc.jpeg
Rubin LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Burner Systems International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rubin LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burner Systems International in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rubin LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Burner Systems International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burner Systems International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rubin LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rubin LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burner-systems-international.jpeg
Burner Systems International
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rubin-llc.jpeg
Rubin LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rubin LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Burner Systems International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rubin LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Burner Systems International company.

In the current year, Rubin LLC company and Burner Systems International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rubin LLC company nor Burner Systems International company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rubin LLC company nor Burner Systems International company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rubin LLC company nor Burner Systems International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Burner Systems International company nor Rubin LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Burner Systems International nor Rubin LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Burner Systems International company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rubin LLC company.

Burner Systems International company employs more people globally than Rubin LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Burner Systems International nor Rubin LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Burner Systems International nor Rubin LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Burner Systems International nor Rubin LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Burner Systems International nor Rubin LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Burner Systems International nor Rubin LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Burner Systems International nor Rubin LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H