Comparison Overview

Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc.

VS

Mutual Graphics, Inc.

Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc.

2600 Chicory Road, Racine, WI, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.burlingtongraphics.com

About Us : Established in 1984, BGS is 100% employee owned company with 175 employee owners suppling OEM & POP decorative graphics. Racine, Wisconsin is home for our 116,000 square foot ISO 9001:2008 certified facility. Services: Our in house services are tailored to meet your needs. Our capabilities include: design, screen-printing, digital printing, flexographic printing, dome coating, metal stamping, hand leafing, product development, commodity management at our customer’s production facility. Products: Pressure sensitive decals, POP signage, caution/warning decals,metal nameplates, multicolor roll striping, pressure sensitive roll labels, waterslide decals and gold leaf decals. Key Markets: OEM, RV, motorcycle, appliance, automotive, marine, farm and construction equipment, and point of purchase advertising.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 86
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mutual Graphics, Inc.

undefined, Powell, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mutualgraphics.com

Providing printed products through independent distributors. We utilize the most current technology in our industry. Our state-of-the-art equipment allows us to provide our clients with high-quality products on time and on budget We realize that most people could care less about what model of press or copy machine we use, so long as they receive what they ordered. Still, we can't help being proud of our toys. Once you see how great they make you look, we hope you'll be proud of them, too.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burlington-graphic-systems-inc-.jpeg
Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mutual-graphics-inc..jpeg
Mutual Graphics, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mutual Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mutual Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mutual Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mutual Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burlington-graphic-systems-inc-.jpeg
Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mutual-graphics-inc..jpeg
Mutual Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mutual Graphics, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mutual Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company.

In the current year, Mutual Graphics, Inc. company and Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mutual Graphics, Inc. company nor Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mutual Graphics, Inc. company nor Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mutual Graphics, Inc. company nor Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company nor Mutual Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. nor Mutual Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company nor Mutual Graphics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. company employs more people globally than Mutual Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. nor Mutual Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. nor Mutual Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. nor Mutual Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. nor Mutual Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. nor Mutual Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Burlington Graphic Systems, Inc. nor Mutual Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References