Comparison Overview

Burke

VS

Red Rock Behavioral Health Services

Burke

2001 S. Medford Dr, Lufkin, 75901, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.myburke.org

Known originally as Deep East Texas Regional MHMR Services, the Burke Center was founded in 1974 and today provides a variety of quality behavioral healthcare services to people with mental illness, mental retardation, and chemical dependency. One of forty-one community centers in the State of Texas, the result of legislation passed in 1965, the Burke Center provides services in a twelve county region that includes: Angelina Co., Houston Co., Jasper Co., Nacogdoches Co., Newton Co., Polk Co., Sabine Co., San Augustine Co., San Jacinto Co., Shelby Co., Trinity Co., and Tyler Co.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 337
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Red Rock Behavioral Health Services

4400 N Lincoln Blvd, None, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, US, None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://www.red-rock.com

Red Rock Behavioral Health Services is a 501(c)3 nonprofit community mental health organization that has served Oklahomans since 1974. As one of the largest Community Mental Health Center (CMHC) in the state and one of the first Certified Community Behavioral Health Center (CCBHC) in the nation, Red Rock BHS provides integrated behavioral health and physical health care coordination to indigent and insured Oklahomans. We are based in Oklahoma City and offer services virtually & in offices in 14 cities across Oklahoma. Our team of over 675 staff members strive to be the foundation of recovery to those who need it, and our mission is to empower Oklahomans to achieve better health & wellness. Connect with us at https://linktr.ee/redrockbhs For employment opportunities, please visit https://www.red-rock.com/careers/

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 396
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burke.jpeg
Burke
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-rock-behavioral-health.jpeg
Red Rock Behavioral Health Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Burke
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Red Rock Behavioral Health Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burke in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Rock Behavioral Health Services in 2026.

Incident History — Burke (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burke cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Red Rock Behavioral Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Rock Behavioral Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burke.jpeg
Burke
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-rock-behavioral-health.jpeg
Red Rock Behavioral Health Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Burke company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Red Rock Behavioral Health Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Red Rock Behavioral Health Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Burke company.

In the current year, Red Rock Behavioral Health Services company and Burke company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Red Rock Behavioral Health Services company nor Burke company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Red Rock Behavioral Health Services company nor Burke company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Red Rock Behavioral Health Services company nor Burke company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Burke company nor Red Rock Behavioral Health Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Burke nor Red Rock Behavioral Health Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Burke company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Red Rock Behavioral Health Services company.

Red Rock Behavioral Health Services company employs more people globally than Burke company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Burke nor Red Rock Behavioral Health Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Burke nor Red Rock Behavioral Health Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Burke nor Red Rock Behavioral Health Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Burke nor Red Rock Behavioral Health Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Burke nor Red Rock Behavioral Health Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Burke nor Red Rock Behavioral Health Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References