Comparison Overview

Buoyant Capital

VS

Atlanta ING Chapter

Buoyant Capital

Manhattan, New York, New York, 10024, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Buoyant Capital Collective understands growth, our extensive experience in venture capital backed companies gives us an insight into the characteristics of high-potential companies and the entrepreneurs who manage them. The collective Is a think tank for solving complex enterprise growth challenges. Why Buoyant Capital Collective? Introduction service to an exclusive network of diverse expert peer advisors. New market entry by accessing our global network of business advisors. Top talent acquisition and performance coaching to prepare your team for rapid expansion. IP, technology, and product management to insure competitiveness in a global market. Capital funding for qualified companies ready to rapidly expand. Real-world role simulation for effective training and development in establishing breakthrough business model innovation. Why now? Operational excellence and organic growth is not enough to compete in the modern global economy. Corporations have been unable to adapt to the rate of change that new technology brings to productivity improvements. Urgency to adopt the practices of high-impact entrepreneurship, the kind that have spectacular results, demands nimble, lean, agile, creative problem solving, the top talent to execute, experience to realize the value. Grow through M&A is not enough, synergies and insight are needed to effectively manage the entire transformational process of integrating new markets, products, and organizations.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Atlanta ING Chapter

North Atlanta, GA, US, 30009
Last Update: 2025-12-04

The Atlanta Chapter of the Industrial Network Group (ING) is focused on enhancing industrial collaboration and driving success in the region. By emphasizing the development of robust networks and sharpening sales abilities, this chapter provides vital opportunities for industry professionals in Atlanta. Its approach is centered on creating a supportive and cooperative environment, enabling members to thrive in the complex and rapidly changing industrial landscape.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buoyant-capital-collective.jpeg
Buoyant Capital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-ing-chapter.jpeg
Atlanta ING Chapter
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Buoyant Capital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atlanta ING Chapter
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Buoyant Capital in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlanta ING Chapter in 2025.

Incident History — Buoyant Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Buoyant Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atlanta ING Chapter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlanta ING Chapter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buoyant-capital-collective.jpeg
Buoyant Capital
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-ing-chapter.jpeg
Atlanta ING Chapter
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Atlanta ING Chapter company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Buoyant Capital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Atlanta ING Chapter company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Buoyant Capital company.

In the current year, Atlanta ING Chapter company and Buoyant Capital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Atlanta ING Chapter company nor Buoyant Capital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Atlanta ING Chapter company nor Buoyant Capital company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Atlanta ING Chapter company nor Buoyant Capital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Buoyant Capital company nor Atlanta ING Chapter company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Buoyant Capital nor Atlanta ING Chapter holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Buoyant Capital company nor Atlanta ING Chapter company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Buoyant Capital nor Atlanta ING Chapter holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Buoyant Capital nor Atlanta ING Chapter holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Buoyant Capital nor Atlanta ING Chapter holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Buoyant Capital nor Atlanta ING Chapter holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Buoyant Capital nor Atlanta ING Chapter holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Buoyant Capital nor Atlanta ING Chapter holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X