Comparison Overview

Bunty LLC

VS

Harrison Orr Air Conditioning

Bunty LLC

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

BuntyLLC, founded in 2000, services the automotive, food processing, and energy industry. BuntyLLC customers include the largest tire manufacturer in the world, the leading transmission supplier to a large japanese automaker, Tier I manufacturers in automotive shocks, brakes, drive trains, and mirror assemblies. BuntyLLC has also provided stainless steel parts for the food processing industry passing FDA standards in production.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Harrison Orr Air Conditioning

4100 N Walnut Ave, Oklahoma City, 73105-3798, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We are an Oklahoma City, OK based mechanical contractor offering a wide range of services to our customers.We have been involved with thousands of projects encompassing every phase of mechanical work, including HVAC, Plumbing, Piping, Welding, Sheetmetal Fabrication, and Design-Build services. Our service department is available to serve you 24 hours a day / 7 days a week. Let us work with you to solve your problems.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bunty-llc.jpeg
Bunty LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Harrison Orr Air Conditioning
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bunty LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Harrison Orr Air Conditioning
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bunty LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harrison Orr Air Conditioning in 2025.

Incident History — Bunty LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bunty LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Harrison Orr Air Conditioning (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harrison Orr Air Conditioning cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bunty-llc.jpeg
Bunty LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Harrison Orr Air Conditioning
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Harrison Orr Air Conditioning company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bunty LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Harrison Orr Air Conditioning company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bunty LLC company.

In the current year, Harrison Orr Air Conditioning company and Bunty LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Harrison Orr Air Conditioning company nor Bunty LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Harrison Orr Air Conditioning company nor Bunty LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Harrison Orr Air Conditioning company nor Bunty LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bunty LLC company nor Harrison Orr Air Conditioning company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bunty LLC nor Harrison Orr Air Conditioning holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bunty LLC company nor Harrison Orr Air Conditioning company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Harrison Orr Air Conditioning company employs more people globally than Bunty LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Bunty LLC nor Harrison Orr Air Conditioning holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bunty LLC nor Harrison Orr Air Conditioning holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bunty LLC nor Harrison Orr Air Conditioning holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bunty LLC nor Harrison Orr Air Conditioning holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bunty LLC nor Harrison Orr Air Conditioning holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bunty LLC nor Harrison Orr Air Conditioning holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H