Comparison Overview

Bunting Graphics, Inc.

VS

Mitie

Bunting Graphics, Inc.

20 River Road, Verona, PA, 15147, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Bunting Graphics is a nationally respected, fully integrated contractor of Signage, Architectural Metals, Rainscreen Systems, and Metal Panel Systems. The business delivers on its promises by controlling the total lifecycle of a project or program. Bunting controls the engineering, project management, manufacturing, & installation by performing these functions with internal resources and defined processes. Our clients can routinely anticipate that Bunting will deliver its products and services on schedule and with integrity in all aspects of its dealings.

NAICS: 5612
NAICS Definition: Facilities Support Services
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mitie

The Shard, Level 12, 32 London Bridge Street, London, UK, SE1 9SG, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Founded in 1987, Mitie is the UKโ€™s leading facilities management and professional services company. We offer a range of specialist services including Security, Engineering Services, Cleaning, Landscaping, Energy and Property Consultancy, Property Maintenance, and Custody Support Services. Mitie employs 77,500 people across the country, looking after a large, diverse, blue-chip customer base, from banks and retailers, to hospitals, schools and government offices. We take care of our customersโ€™ people and buildings, by delivering the basics brilliantly and by deploying advanced technology. We are pioneers in the Connected Workspace, using smart analytics to provide valuable insight and deliver efficiencies to create outstanding work environments for customers.

NAICS: 5612
NAICS Definition: Facilities Support Services
Employees: 17,395
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bunting-graphics-inc-.jpeg
Bunting Graphics, Inc.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitie.jpeg
Mitie
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Bunting Graphics, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mitie
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bunting Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitie in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Bunting Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bunting Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Mitie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bunting-graphics-inc-.jpeg
Bunting Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitie.jpeg
Mitie
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Bunting Graphics, Inc. company and Mitie company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Mitie company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bunting Graphics, Inc. company.

In the current year, Mitie company and Bunting Graphics, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mitie company nor Bunting Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mitie company nor Bunting Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mitie company nor Bunting Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bunting Graphics, Inc. company nor Mitie company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Mitie company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bunting Graphics, Inc. company.

Mitie company employs more people globally than Bunting Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Facilities Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X