Comparison Overview

Bunnings

VS

Rumah

Bunnings

570 Swan Street, Burnley, Victoria, AU, 3121
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

We are the leading retailer of home improvement and outdoor living products in Australia & New Zealand and a major supplier to project builders, commercial tradespeople and the housing industry. Our ambition is to provide our customers with the widest range of home improvement products in accordance with our lowest prices policy, backed with the best service. Our social media community standards can be found here: https://www.bunnings.com.au/policies/community-standards

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 16,961
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rumah

Centro, Balneário Camboriú, BR
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Fundada em Junho de 2015, a Rumah é uma loja online especializada em artigos de decoração e itens para a casa, entregando seus produtos para o Brasil inteiro. Com um portfólio grande e variado, a Rumah proporciona diversas opções para seus clientes em várias categorias. Das influências clássicas, modernas, sofisticadas às rústicas e despojadas, aliamos a funcionalidade e inovação ao conforto, praticidade e beleza para integrar espaços com mix de produtos bem pensado e sempre atento às novas tendências.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 13,643
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bunnings.jpeg
Bunnings
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rumah.jpeg
Rumah
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bunnings
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rumah
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bunnings in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rumah in 2026.

Incident History — Bunnings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bunnings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rumah (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rumah cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bunnings.jpeg
Bunnings
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rumah.jpeg
Rumah
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bunnings company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rumah company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rumah company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bunnings company.

In the current year, Rumah company and Bunnings company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rumah company nor Bunnings company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rumah company nor Bunnings company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rumah company nor Bunnings company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bunnings company nor Rumah company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bunnings nor Rumah holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bunnings company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rumah company.

Bunnings company employs more people globally than Rumah company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Bunnings nor Rumah holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bunnings nor Rumah holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bunnings nor Rumah holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bunnings nor Rumah holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bunnings nor Rumah holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bunnings nor Rumah holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.