Comparison Overview

Building Better Healthcare

VS

Scientific American

Building Better Healthcare

55 Bermondsey Street, London, SE1 3XG, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.buildingbetterhealthcare.co.uk

Building Better Healthcare is a leading web and print resource for healthcare professionals who require the latest news and analysis on innovations in the built environment and medical device sectors. Updated daily, our website is a must read for healthcare practitioners, managers and suppliers. The Building Better Healthcare Awards celebrate innovation, architecture, people, products and services that are transforming patient care and outcomes.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Scientific American

1 New York Plaza, New York, New York, 10004, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ScientificAmerican.com

Scientific American, the oldest continuously published magazine in the U.S., has been bringing its readers unique insights about developments in science and technology since 1845. More than 140 Nobel laureates have written for Scientific American, most of whom wrote about their prize-winning works years before being recognized by the Nobel Committee. In addition to the likes of Albert Einstein, Francis Crick, Jonas Salk and Linus Pauling, Scientific American continues to attract esteemed authors from many fields: World leaders: former Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland of Norway, former United Nations Secretary-General Trygve Lie U.S. Government Officials: former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, former Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, former Secretary of Defense Les Aspin Economists and Industrialists: John Kenneth Galbraith, Lester Thurow, Mitchell Kapor, Michael Dertouzos, Nicholas Negroponte Scientific American is a truly global enterprise. Scientific American publishes 15 Editions Worldwide, read in more than 30 countries, with a worldwide audience of more than 5.3 million people. Launched 1996, www.ScientificAmerican.com has become dynamic resource for science news, including blogs, podcasts, videos, and interactive media. Visitors to the site also have access to Science Jobs, the career board for professionals in the science and technology industries.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 237
Subsidiaries: 31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/building-better-healthcare.jpeg
Building Better Healthcare
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scientific-american.jpeg
Scientific American
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Building Better Healthcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scientific American
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Building Better Healthcare in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scientific American in 2025.

Incident History — Building Better Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Building Better Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scientific American (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scientific American cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/building-better-healthcare.jpeg
Building Better Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scientific-american.jpeg
Scientific American
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Scientific American company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Building Better Healthcare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Scientific American company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Building Better Healthcare company.

In the current year, Scientific American company and Building Better Healthcare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scientific American company nor Building Better Healthcare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Scientific American company nor Building Better Healthcare company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Scientific American company nor Building Better Healthcare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Building Better Healthcare company nor Scientific American company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Building Better Healthcare nor Scientific American holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Scientific American company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Building Better Healthcare company.

Neither Building Better Healthcare nor Scientific American holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Building Better Healthcare nor Scientific American holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Building Better Healthcare nor Scientific American holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Building Better Healthcare nor Scientific American holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Building Better Healthcare nor Scientific American holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Building Better Healthcare nor Scientific American holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References