Comparison Overview

Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra

VS

South Carolina Ballet

Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra

499 Franklin Street, Buffalo, 14202, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bpo.org

Welcome to the Grammy Award Winning Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra LinkedIn Page! Looking for a great team-building experience? Do you have important clients you need to entertain? BPO concerts provide quality entertainment in an elegant and impressive setting. Ask about our group and corporate discounts, and make your plans for an evening to remember! As Buffalo's cultural ambassador, the BPO presents more than 120 Classics, Pops and Youth Concerts each year in Western New York. During the tenure of current music director JoAnn Falletta, the Buffalo Philharmonic has rekindled its distinguished history of PBS broadcasts and recordings, including the release of 37 new CDs of a highly diverse repertoire on the NAXOS and Beau Fleuve labels.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

South Carolina Ballet

1545 Main St , Columbia, SC, 29201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.southcarolinaballet.com/

Columbia City Ballet is now South Carolina Ballet, located at 1545 Main Street in Columbia, is a nonprofit performing arts organization that presents productions throughout South Carolina and the United States. Founded in 1961, the company is celebrating its 63rd anniversary of continuous performance seasons. As a professional ballet company, Columbia City Ballet performs 4 to 5 mainstage ballets each season. It also presents 2 productions from its Educational Outreach and Engagement Series in addition to its active touring schedule.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-philharmonic-orchestra.jpeg
Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-columbia-city-ballet.jpeg
South Carolina Ballet
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
South Carolina Ballet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South Carolina Ballet in 2025.

Incident History — Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — South Carolina Ballet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Carolina Ballet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-philharmonic-orchestra.jpeg
Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-columbia-city-ballet.jpeg
South Carolina Ballet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

South Carolina Ballet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, South Carolina Ballet company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra company.

In the current year, South Carolina Ballet company and Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither South Carolina Ballet company nor Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither South Carolina Ballet company nor Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither South Carolina Ballet company nor Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra company nor South Carolina Ballet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra nor South Carolina Ballet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra company nor South Carolina Ballet company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra company employs more people globally than South Carolina Ballet company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra nor South Carolina Ballet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra nor South Carolina Ballet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra nor South Carolina Ballet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra nor South Carolina Ballet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra nor South Carolina Ballet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra nor South Carolina Ballet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References