Comparison Overview

Buffalo Law Review

VS

Energy Users Association of Australia

Buffalo Law Review

605 O'Brian Hall, University at Buffalo School of Law, Buffalo, New York, US, 14260
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Buffalo Law Review, published since 1951, publishes 5 issues per year, with each issue containing articles from scholars, practitioners, and judges. The Law Review also publishes member-written pieces on contemporary legal issues. The Buffalo Law Review prides itself on maintaining the highest level of integrity and objectivity in its selection process. Admission to the Law Review is open to the entire student body. Every year 28 to 32 new members are selected. Half of the new members are selected based on first-year grades, casenote scores, and diversity statements and half of the new members are selected based solely on a combination of casenote and diversity statement scores. Members may also be added from students transferring to the School of Law, based on casenote and diversity statement scores.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Energy Users Association of Australia

Level 6, 555 Lonsdale St., Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

The Energy Users Association of Australia (EUAA) is the national association of large electricity and gas users. We have around 100 members across Australia, which includes many of the Australia's largest users but membership also extends down to smaller businesses. The issues we focus on include:- Electricity & Gas retail markets, Network pricing, Environmental policy, Electricity & Gas market Regulation, Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency. At the EUAA we are dedicated to working with and on behalf of energy users and serve the interests of our members in two main ways: - Through advocacy to ensure that energy markets and regulation delivers competitively-priced and reliable energy supply to members; and - By providing a range of relevant services to members that better inform and help them to operate more effectively in the energy market.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-law-review.jpeg
Buffalo Law Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/energy-users-association-of-australia.jpeg
Energy Users Association of Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Buffalo Law Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Energy Users Association of Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Buffalo Law Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Energy Users Association of Australia in 2025.

Incident History — Buffalo Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Buffalo Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Energy Users Association of Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Energy Users Association of Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-law-review.jpeg
Buffalo Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/energy-users-association-of-australia.jpeg
Energy Users Association of Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Buffalo Law Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Energy Users Association of Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Energy Users Association of Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Buffalo Law Review company.

In the current year, Energy Users Association of Australia company and Buffalo Law Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Energy Users Association of Australia company nor Buffalo Law Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Energy Users Association of Australia company nor Buffalo Law Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Energy Users Association of Australia company nor Buffalo Law Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Buffalo Law Review company nor Energy Users Association of Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Buffalo Law Review nor Energy Users Association of Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Buffalo Law Review company nor Energy Users Association of Australia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Buffalo Law Review company employs more people globally than Energy Users Association of Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Buffalo Law Review nor Energy Users Association of Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Buffalo Law Review nor Energy Users Association of Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Buffalo Law Review nor Energy Users Association of Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Buffalo Law Review nor Energy Users Association of Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Buffalo Law Review nor Energy Users Association of Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Buffalo Law Review nor Energy Users Association of Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H