Comparison Overview

Buffalo Abrasives, Inc.

VS

Metallisation / Kymera International

Buffalo Abrasives, Inc.

960 Erie Avenue, North Tonawanda, 14120, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. is a manufacturer of high performance and specialty made abrasive grinding wheels. We offer a complete line of resin, rubber, shellac and vitrified bonds with an extensive range of grain types and grit sizes. Our application engineers work with your team to provide non-catalog, highly engineered custom grinding wheels to ensure optimized performance for your grinding applications. We offer no risk product trials to evaluate our product with your application needs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Metallisation / Kymera International

Peartree Lane, Dudley, West Midlands, DY2 OXH, GB
Last Update: 2025-10-27
Between 750 and 799

Metallisation is now a part of Kymera International. https://www.kymerainternational.com/surface-technologies/ Established in 1922, Metallisation Ltd is one of the leading manufacturers of equipment such as Arcspray, Flamespray, Plasma, HVOF and Automated Spraying Systems. We have the expertise to not only bring you the most advanced metal spraying technology, but also extensive knowledge in surface engineering. Our equipment has been designed for a wide range of uses - from universal corrosion protection of steel fabrications to engineering coating applications within the automotive, aerospace, oil/gas and manufacturing industries.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-abrasives.jpeg
Buffalo Abrasives, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metallisation-ltd.jpeg
Metallisation / Kymera International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Buffalo Abrasives, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Metallisation / Kymera International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metallisation / Kymera International in 2025.

Incident History — Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Metallisation / Kymera International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metallisation / Kymera International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-abrasives.jpeg
Buffalo Abrasives, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metallisation-ltd.jpeg
Metallisation / Kymera International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Metallisation / Kymera International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Metallisation / Kymera International company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. company.

In the current year, Metallisation / Kymera International company and Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Metallisation / Kymera International company nor Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Metallisation / Kymera International company nor Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Metallisation / Kymera International company nor Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. company nor Metallisation / Kymera International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. nor Metallisation / Kymera International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. company nor Metallisation / Kymera International company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Metallisation / Kymera International company employs more people globally than Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. nor Metallisation / Kymera International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. nor Metallisation / Kymera International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. nor Metallisation / Kymera International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. nor Metallisation / Kymera International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. nor Metallisation / Kymera International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. nor Metallisation / Kymera International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H