Comparison Overview

Buffalo & Associates LLC

VS

Singleton Cooksey PLLC

Buffalo & Associates LLC

551 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Buffalo & Associates LLC is a boutique law firm specializing in business and securities transactions for small to middle-market companies. We provide a value alternative to clients seeking legal service at a level of sophistication and care comparable to New York's finest firms. We take pride in building close relationships with our clients, seeking to provide the highest level of access, the best attentive service and quickest response times. We view our legal service as a profession, rather than industry, and this philosophy is reflected in the way we approach our matters as service and the way we approach our clients as individuals.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Singleton Cooksey PLLC

undefined, undefined, undefined, 77057, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

At Singleton ♦ Cooksey, our practice emphasizes meeting the needs of entrepreneurs and dynamic organizations from entity formation through financing, expansion, reorganization, dispute resolution and winding-up. We are available to assist during all phases of the business life cycle. Our attorneys have over 150 years of collective experience in the practice of law. Each of our practice areas is headed by an AV rated partner with considerable experience in that field. As a result, we are able to deliver quality results without sacrificing what our clients appreciate most about small firms – accessibility, personal attention, and timely and economical completion of the project. As a convenience to our clients, we also provide a variety of other services to address their personal legal needs.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-&-associates-llc.jpeg
Buffalo & Associates LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/singleton-cooksey-pllc.jpeg
Singleton Cooksey PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Buffalo & Associates LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Singleton Cooksey PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Buffalo & Associates LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Singleton Cooksey PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — Buffalo & Associates LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Buffalo & Associates LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Singleton Cooksey PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Singleton Cooksey PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-&-associates-llc.jpeg
Buffalo & Associates LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/singleton-cooksey-pllc.jpeg
Singleton Cooksey PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Singleton Cooksey PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Buffalo & Associates LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Singleton Cooksey PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Buffalo & Associates LLC company.

In the current year, Singleton Cooksey PLLC company and Buffalo & Associates LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Singleton Cooksey PLLC company nor Buffalo & Associates LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Singleton Cooksey PLLC company nor Buffalo & Associates LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Singleton Cooksey PLLC company nor Buffalo & Associates LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC company nor Singleton Cooksey PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Singleton Cooksey PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC company nor Singleton Cooksey PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Singleton Cooksey PLLC company employs more people globally than Buffalo & Associates LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Singleton Cooksey PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Singleton Cooksey PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Singleton Cooksey PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Singleton Cooksey PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Singleton Cooksey PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Singleton Cooksey PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X