Comparison Overview

Buffalo & Associates LLC

VS

Macks Solicitors

Buffalo & Associates LLC

551 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Buffalo & Associates LLC is a boutique law firm specializing in business and securities transactions for small to middle-market companies. We provide a value alternative to clients seeking legal service at a level of sophistication and care comparable to New York's finest firms. We take pride in building close relationships with our clients, seeking to provide the highest level of access, the best attentive service and quickest response times. We view our legal service as a profession, rather than industry, and this philosophy is reflected in the way we approach our matters as service and the way we approach our clients as individuals.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Macks Solicitors

4 Woodlands Road, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Macks Solicitors are experts in personal injury, conveyancing, wills and probate, family law, property and employment law. We are a long established and trusted law firm that puts our clients first. We pride ourselves on providing exceptional client care and are proud to be one of the UK's highest rated solicitors on Trust Pilot. We understand that no two clients are alike, which is why we always take the time to listen to you, providing advice completely tailored to suit your individual needs. Why not contact us for a FREE consultation with a solicitor to discuss your needs. Our lines are open 7 days a week 8:00am - 9:00pm so give us a call today on 0800 652 4321 or from mobiles on 0330 166 5182 for a FREE consultation with a solicitor.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-&-associates-llc.jpeg
Buffalo & Associates LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macks-solicitors.jpeg
Macks Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Buffalo & Associates LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Macks Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Buffalo & Associates LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Macks Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Buffalo & Associates LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Buffalo & Associates LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Macks Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Macks Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-&-associates-llc.jpeg
Buffalo & Associates LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macks-solicitors.jpeg
Macks Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Buffalo & Associates LLC company and Macks Solicitors company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Macks Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Buffalo & Associates LLC company.

In the current year, Macks Solicitors company and Buffalo & Associates LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Macks Solicitors company nor Buffalo & Associates LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Macks Solicitors company nor Buffalo & Associates LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Macks Solicitors company nor Buffalo & Associates LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC company nor Macks Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Macks Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC company nor Macks Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Macks Solicitors company employs more people globally than Buffalo & Associates LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Macks Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Macks Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Macks Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Macks Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Macks Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Buffalo & Associates LLC nor Macks Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X