Comparison Overview

Cactus Graphics

VS

Acme Printing Company

Cactus Graphics

Unit 19-22 Tridax Business Park, Honeywood Parkway, Dover, Kent, CT16 3QX, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Changing the way you print! We are Kent's freshest design and print team! We are in the business of providing branding, advertising, graphic design and print services to help you stand out from the crowd and perform better. By creating want and desire for your products and services, we can help you entice new customers and delight existing ones. We partner with businesses whose wish is to unlock the unique value of their brand. Through collaboration and in-depth consultation, we deliver expert branding, design, print and brand communications services to help businesses achieve their potential. Our expertise is guided by best practice and driven by our desire to create the best solutions for our clients. This not only defines our strategic approach to every brief and the high quality of work produced, but ensures the success of every project and partnership. Get in touch, we’d love to hear from you. For more information, to get a quote, ask us to come and see you, don’t be shy.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Acme Printing Company

1100 East Main Street, Morristown, 37814, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Acme Printing is the market leader in providing our customers with top-of-the-line digital and offset commercial printing, graphic design, finishing, labels, wide format signs and banners, and now promotional items. Our customers know that even with the proliferation of digital media, printed items such as rack cards, brochures, business cards, and flyers are extremely effective in getting their message out to their marketplace. We offer fast turnaround times, lower costs and the ability to print smaller quantities that allow our customers to target more specific audiences.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buckland-media-group-ltd.jpeg
Cactus Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acme-printing-company.jpeg
Acme Printing Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cactus Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Acme Printing Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cactus Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acme Printing Company in 2025.

Incident History — Cactus Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cactus Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Acme Printing Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acme Printing Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buckland-media-group-ltd.jpeg
Cactus Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acme-printing-company.jpeg
Acme Printing Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Acme Printing Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cactus Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Acme Printing Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cactus Graphics company.

In the current year, Acme Printing Company company and Cactus Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Acme Printing Company company nor Cactus Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Acme Printing Company company nor Cactus Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Acme Printing Company company nor Cactus Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cactus Graphics company nor Acme Printing Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cactus Graphics nor Acme Printing Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cactus Graphics company nor Acme Printing Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cactus Graphics company employs more people globally than Acme Printing Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Cactus Graphics nor Acme Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cactus Graphics nor Acme Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cactus Graphics nor Acme Printing Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cactus Graphics nor Acme Printing Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cactus Graphics nor Acme Printing Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cactus Graphics nor Acme Printing Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N