Comparison Overview

BTST Services

VS

Blue Humming Therapy

BTST Services

1900 N Howard St, Baltimore, 21218, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

BTST IS A CARF ACCREDITED LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH AGENCY providing comprehensive programing and integrated care to children, teens and adults throughout the state of Maryland. BTST works to stay on the cutting edge of technological advancements to provide our clients with the most efficient and accessible care, in an ever changing society. ​ BTST takes an individualized and strength based approach to care, as we realize that each person’s needs and required treatment modalities are unique and vary case by case. https://www.eventbrite.com/e/nails-toes-convos-solutions-not-resolutions-tickets-87688158643?aff=utm_source%3Deb_email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_campaign%3Dnew_event_email&utm_term=eventurl_text

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 77
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Blue Humming Therapy

447 Sutter St., San Francisco, 94108, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Blue Humming Therapy offers thoughtful mental health services to our clients and communities.We believe everyone deserves to receive the humanistic support and the best quality of mental wellness service.We compassionately work with our clients and communities.Blue Humming Therapy was formed by clinicians and staffs that represent very diverse ethnicities, races, cultures, and values. We respect each background and value the uniqueness of individuals. Understanding and accepting someone who has different background is not easy. We try to understand each other and think about the real meaning of "co-working." We believe that everyone deserves to receive the humanistic support and the best quality of mental wellness service. In order to achieve our goal, we keep our uniqueness of DIVERSE, BALANCE, and INTEGRATION.Through our work, we found out how an organization can bring out the strengths in each individual and also effectively function as a team. This balanced work as an individual and group enables us to help promote the mental wellness of our clients and communities more effectively. Our organization values of "Trust, Quality, Equality, Acceptance, Compassion, Openness, and Harmony" help us to improve our service and offer better humanistic mental health support to our clients and communities.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/btstservices.jpeg
BTST Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-humming-therapy.jpeg
Blue Humming Therapy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BTST Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Blue Humming Therapy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BTST Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Humming Therapy in 2026.

Incident History — BTST Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BTST Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Blue Humming Therapy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blue Humming Therapy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/btstservices.jpeg
BTST Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-humming-therapy.jpeg
Blue Humming Therapy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both BTST Services company and Blue Humming Therapy company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Blue Humming Therapy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BTST Services company.

In the current year, Blue Humming Therapy company and BTST Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Blue Humming Therapy company nor BTST Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Blue Humming Therapy company nor BTST Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Blue Humming Therapy company nor BTST Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BTST Services company nor Blue Humming Therapy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BTST Services nor Blue Humming Therapy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BTST Services company nor Blue Humming Therapy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BTST Services company employs more people globally than Blue Humming Therapy company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither BTST Services nor Blue Humming Therapy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BTST Services nor Blue Humming Therapy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BTST Services nor Blue Humming Therapy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BTST Services nor Blue Humming Therapy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BTST Services nor Blue Humming Therapy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BTST Services nor Blue Humming Therapy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N