Comparison Overview

BTL Technologies, Inc.

VS

Hodes & Landy

BTL Technologies, Inc.

1777 N.E. Loop 410, San Antonio, TX, 78217, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

BTL Technologies is a world-class, visionary company which specializes in providing medical, information technology (IT), and management services. BTL believes in partnering with clients to exploit technology and expand horizons of service excellence in order to advance its clients’ missions. BTL is an 8(a), SDB, service disabled veteran-owned small business specializing in providing its services to federal as well as commercial clients. BTL is dedicated to ensuring that all contracts are completed smoothly and successfully through superior management and attention to detail. As a values-driven company, BTL is dedicated to integrity, quality, flexibility, people, service, and responsiveness. BTL has over five years of experience in quickly staffing and effectively managing and administering government contracts nationally. This experience has formed BTL’s comprehensive and proven management plan which leverages its employees’ knowledge and capabilities to provide clients with the ability to smoothly transition, perform, and manage their contracts. BTL Technologies looks forward to working with your company in meeting your medical, IT, and management needs. Whether you require medical or IT services; training, staff augmentation, system integration, IT investment and management; project, change, or workforce management; or electronic business services, BTL’s goal is to help you succeed.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hodes & Landy

284 State Street, Albany, New York, 12210, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Hodes & Landy is a full-service government affairs firm, located steps from the New York State Capitol with a proven track record of high quality ethical representation, and exceptional results. Since 1992, Hodes & Landy has employed a unique, hands-on approach to consulting and lobbying. We provide a level of personal service and quality representation that goes far beyond industry standards, believing that every client deserves a customized approach to government relations. We pride ourselves on offering solutions that come from a thorough understanding of our clients'​ positions and goals; achieving the kind of results you only get from a truly committed firm. Our advocacy expertise gives you the advantage. Follow our page for the latest updates regarding legislation and our efforts on behalf of the senior care community.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/btl-technologies-inc-.jpeg
BTL Technologies, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hodes-&-landy.jpeg
Hodes & Landy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BTL Technologies, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hodes & Landy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BTL Technologies, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hodes & Landy in 2025.

Incident History — BTL Technologies, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BTL Technologies, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hodes & Landy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hodes & Landy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/btl-technologies-inc-.jpeg
BTL Technologies, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hodes-&-landy.jpeg
Hodes & Landy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both BTL Technologies, Inc. company and Hodes & Landy company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Hodes & Landy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BTL Technologies, Inc. company.

In the current year, Hodes & Landy company and BTL Technologies, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hodes & Landy company nor BTL Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hodes & Landy company nor BTL Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hodes & Landy company nor BTL Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BTL Technologies, Inc. company nor Hodes & Landy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BTL Technologies, Inc. nor Hodes & Landy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BTL Technologies, Inc. company nor Hodes & Landy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BTL Technologies, Inc. company employs more people globally than Hodes & Landy company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither BTL Technologies, Inc. nor Hodes & Landy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BTL Technologies, Inc. nor Hodes & Landy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BTL Technologies, Inc. nor Hodes & Landy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BTL Technologies, Inc. nor Hodes & Landy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BTL Technologies, Inc. nor Hodes & Landy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BTL Technologies, Inc. nor Hodes & Landy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N