Comparison Overview

Baylor Scott & White Health

VS

Rochester Regional Health

Baylor Scott & White Health

3500 Gaston Ave, Dallas, Texas, 75246, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://bswhealth.com

With us by your side, there's no stopping you. It's why we're creating a new kind of healthcare at Baylor Scott & White. And we're just getting started. As the largest not-for-profit health system in the state of Texas, Baylor Scott & White promotes the health and well-being of every individual, family and community it serves. It is committed to making quality care more accessible, convenient and affordable through its integrated delivery network, which includes the Baylor Scott & White Health Plan, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, the Baylor Scott & White Quality Alliance and its leading digital health platform — MyBSWHealth. Through 52 hospitals and more than 1,300 access points, including flagship academic medical centers in Dallas, Fort Worth and Temple, the system offers the full continuum of care, from primary to award-winning specialty care. Founded as a Christian ministry of healing more than a century ago, Baylor Scott & White today serves more than three million Texans. For more information visit: BSWHealth.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 28,429
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Rochester Regional Health

100 S Kings Hwy, Rochester, New York, US, 14617
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rochesterregional.org

Rochester Regional Health, headquartered in Rochester, NY, is an integrated health services organization serving the people of Western New York, the Finger Lakes, St. Lawrence County, and beyond. We are dedicated to helping our community stay healthy and live fulfilling lives. Together, we find the best way forward to where you want to be. From western to northern New York, rest assured; we’ve got you covered. We see you. We’re with you. We’re here to uplift you—to treat people, not symptoms. To treat you well. Our experience is nation-leading, neighbor-driven, and rooted in generations of real-life care. Today, we offer comprehensive care from 500+ locations, including 8 hospitals; more than 300 primary and specialty practices, rehabilitation centers and ambulatory campuses; innovative senior services, facilities and independent housing; a wide range of behavioral health services; and ACM Global Laboratories, a global leader in patient and clinical trials. Whatever you need, from every age, to every stage, across every service line, and every symptom... Whatever it is, we’re here for it. Learn more about Rochester Regional Health at careers.rochesterregional.org. Rochester Regional Health is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer. Minority/Female/Disability/Veteran

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 10,946
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bswhealth.jpeg
Baylor Scott & White Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rochesterregionalhealth.jpeg
Rochester Regional Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Baylor Scott & White Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rochester Regional Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baylor Scott & White Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rochester Regional Health in 2025.

Incident History — Baylor Scott & White Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baylor Scott & White Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rochester Regional Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rochester Regional Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bswhealth.jpeg
Baylor Scott & White Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rochesterregionalhealth.jpeg
Rochester Regional Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Baylor Scott & White Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rochester Regional Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Rochester Regional Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Baylor Scott & White Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, Rochester Regional Health company and Baylor Scott & White Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Rochester Regional Health company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Baylor Scott & White Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Rochester Regional Health company nor Baylor Scott & White Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rochester Regional Health company nor Baylor Scott & White Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Baylor Scott & White Health company nor Rochester Regional Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Baylor Scott & White Health nor Rochester Regional Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rochester Regional Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Baylor Scott & White Health company.

Baylor Scott & White Health company employs more people globally than Rochester Regional Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Baylor Scott & White Health nor Rochester Regional Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Baylor Scott & White Health nor Rochester Regional Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Baylor Scott & White Health nor Rochester Regional Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Baylor Scott & White Health nor Rochester Regional Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Baylor Scott & White Health nor Rochester Regional Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Baylor Scott & White Health nor Rochester Regional Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References