Comparison Overview

BSH Home Appliances Group

VS

Procter & Gamble

BSH Home Appliances Group

Carl-Wery-Str. 34, Munich, 81739, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

BSH Hausgeräte GmbH is one of the world’s leading home appliance manufacturers [1]. Our brand portfolio includes global appliance brands like Bosch, Siemens and Gaggenau, as well as the regional brands Neff and Thermador, each offering unique solutions tailored to meet the needs of our consumers. [1] BSH is a Trademark Licensee of Robert Bosch GmbH and Siemens AG for the brands Bosch and Siemens. Founded in 1967, BSH was established as a joint venture between Robert Bosch GmbH (Stuttgart) and Siemens AG (Munich). BSH has been under the sole ownership of Bosch Group since January 2015. In its over 50 years of history, BSH has grown from a German exporter into one of the world's leading home appliance manufacturers. Local BSH locations participate in global DEI programs to the extent compliant with local law. Data Protection Information: https://www.bsh-group.com/data-protection-information Our Netiquette: https://www.bsh-group.com/bsh-social-media-netiquette?fbclid=IwAR3W9AfRHl1c4UjRFSviX4YcR3J9EwtXXBoCB-XzXE7NZHfcUgnYYo9mgyU

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 21,068
Subsidiaries: 29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Procter & Gamble

2 P&G Plaza, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45202, US
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 800 and 849

P&G was founded more than 185 years ago as a soap and candle company. Today, we’re one of the world’s largest consumer goods companies and home to iconic, trusted brands, including Always®, Charmin®, Braun®, Fairy®, Febreze®, Gillette®, Head & Shoulders®, Oral B®, Pantene®, Pampers®, Tide®, and Vicks®. The design, development, growth and success of these products—and many more—is thanks to the innovative and insightful minds of our people. From Day 1, you’ll help make everyday life easier for our 5 billion consumers. There is no single equation for success at P&G, because no two P&G people or careers are alike. Just as we strive to deliver a superior consumer experience, we aim to deliver a superior employee value equation as well. With our large global footprint, there are many opportunities to work with P&G in multiple locations. We offer opportunities in approximately 70 countries and continually aim to attract, reward and advance the finest people in the world. Here, we want you to get your career off to a fast start. That's why we don't have any rotational development programs or gradual ramping-up periods: you’ll be able—and encouraged—to dive right in from Day 1. Join us and help make life better through meaningful work that makes an impact from Day 1.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 91,835
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bsh-home-appliances-group.jpeg
BSH Home Appliances Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/procter-and-gamble.jpeg
Procter & Gamble
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BSH Home Appliances Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Procter & Gamble
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BSH Home Appliances Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Procter & Gamble in 2025.

Incident History — BSH Home Appliances Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BSH Home Appliances Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Procter & Gamble (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Procter & Gamble cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bsh-home-appliances-group.jpeg
BSH Home Appliances Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/procter-and-gamble.jpeg
Procter & Gamble
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Procter & Gamble company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BSH Home Appliances Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Procter & Gamble company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BSH Home Appliances Group company.

In the current year, Procter & Gamble company and BSH Home Appliances Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Procter & Gamble company nor BSH Home Appliances Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Procter & Gamble company nor BSH Home Appliances Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Procter & Gamble company nor BSH Home Appliances Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group company nor Procter & Gamble company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Procter & Gamble holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BSH Home Appliances Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Procter & Gamble company.

Procter & Gamble company employs more people globally than BSH Home Appliances Group company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Procter & Gamble holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Procter & Gamble holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Procter & Gamble holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Procter & Gamble holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Procter & Gamble holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Procter & Gamble holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in qs (parse modules) allows HTTP DoS.This issue affects qs: < 6.14.1. SummaryThe arrayLimit option in qs does not enforce limits for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2), allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. Applications using arrayLimit for DoS protection are vulnerable. DetailsThe arrayLimit option only checks limits for indexed notation (a[0]=1&a[1]=2) but completely bypasses it for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2). Vulnerable code (lib/parse.js:159-162): if (root === '[]' && options.parseArrays) { obj = utils.combine([], leaf); // No arrayLimit check } Working code (lib/parse.js:175): else if (index <= options.arrayLimit) { // Limit checked here obj = []; obj[index] = leaf; } The bracket notation handler at line 159 uses utils.combine([], leaf) without validating against options.arrayLimit, while indexed notation at line 175 checks index <= options.arrayLimit before creating arrays. PoCTest 1 - Basic bypass: npm install qs const qs = require('qs'); const result = qs.parse('a[]=1&a[]=2&a[]=3&a[]=4&a[]=5&a[]=6', { arrayLimit: 5 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 6 (should be max 5) Test 2 - DoS demonstration: const qs = require('qs'); const attack = 'a[]=' + Array(10000).fill('x').join('&a[]='); const result = qs.parse(attack, { arrayLimit: 100 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 10000 (should be max 100) Configuration: * arrayLimit: 5 (test 1) or arrayLimit: 100 (test 2) * Use bracket notation: a[]=value (not indexed a[0]=value) ImpactDenial of Service via memory exhaustion. Affects applications using qs.parse() with user-controlled input and arrayLimit for protection. Attack scenario: * Attacker sends HTTP request: GET /api/search?filters[]=x&filters[]=x&...&filters[]=x (100,000+ times) * Application parses with qs.parse(query, { arrayLimit: 100 }) * qs ignores limit, parses all 100,000 elements into array * Server memory exhausted → application crashes or becomes unresponsive * Service unavailable for all users Real-world impact: * Single malicious request can crash server * No authentication required * Easy to automate and scale * Affects any endpoint parsing query strings with bracket notation

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /home/editfood.php. This manipulation of the argument a/b/c/d causes sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /home/editrefugee.php. The manipulation of the argument rfid results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Mobile Builder Mobile builder allows Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Mobile builder: from n/a through 1.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Hiroaki Miyashita Custom Field Template allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Custom Field Template: from n/a through 2.7.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L