Comparison Overview

BSH Home Appliances Group

VS

Electrolux Group

BSH Home Appliances Group

Carl-Wery-Str. 34, Munich, 81739, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

BSH Hausgeräte GmbH is one of the world’s leading home appliance manufacturers [1]. Our brand portfolio includes global appliance brands like Bosch, Siemens and Gaggenau, as well as the regional brands Neff and Thermador, each offering unique solutions tailored to meet the needs of our consumers. [1] BSH is a Trademark Licensee of Robert Bosch GmbH and Siemens AG for the brands Bosch and Siemens. Founded in 1967, BSH was established as a joint venture between Robert Bosch GmbH (Stuttgart) and Siemens AG (Munich). BSH has been under the sole ownership of Bosch Group since January 2015. In its over 50 years of history, BSH has grown from a German exporter into one of the world's leading home appliance manufacturers. Local BSH locations participate in global DEI programs to the extent compliant with local law. Data Protection Information: https://www.bsh-group.com/data-protection-information Our Netiquette: https://www.bsh-group.com/bsh-social-media-netiquette?fbclid=IwAR3W9AfRHl1c4UjRFSviX4YcR3J9EwtXXBoCB-XzXE7NZHfcUgnYYo9mgyU

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 21,068
Subsidiaries: 29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Electrolux Group

Electrolux - Stockholm, Stockholm, SE, SE-10545
Last Update: 2025-12-26

Electrolux Group is a leading global appliance company that has shaped living for the better for more than 100 years. We reinvent taste, care and wellbeing experiences for millions of people, always striving to be at the forefront of sustainability in society through our solutions and operations. Under our group of leading appliance brands, including Electrolux, AEG and Frigidaire, we sell household products in around 120 markets every year. In 2024 Electrolux Group had sales of SEK 136 billion and employed approximately 41,000 people around the world. For more information go to www.electroluxgroup.com Comment moderation guidelines: We welcome open, respectful and constructive conversation on this page. At Electrolux Group, our values of respect, dignity and courtesy guide how we engage online, and we ask that all contributions align with these principles and LinkedIn’s Community Guidelines and User Agreement. To ensure a safe and inclusive environment, we reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive, offensive, disruptive, misleading or false, repetitive or off-topic. We may also block or report users who repeatedly violate these guidelines. Please note that comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of Electrolux Group.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 26,982
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bsh-home-appliances-group.jpeg
BSH Home Appliances Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electroluxgroup.jpeg
Electrolux Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BSH Home Appliances Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Electrolux Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BSH Home Appliances Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electrolux Group in 2025.

Incident History — BSH Home Appliances Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BSH Home Appliances Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Electrolux Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electrolux Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bsh-home-appliances-group.jpeg
BSH Home Appliances Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electroluxgroup.jpeg
Electrolux Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Electrolux Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BSH Home Appliances Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Electrolux Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BSH Home Appliances Group company.

In the current year, Electrolux Group company and BSH Home Appliances Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Electrolux Group company nor BSH Home Appliances Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Electrolux Group company nor BSH Home Appliances Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Electrolux Group company nor BSH Home Appliances Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group company nor Electrolux Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Electrolux Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BSH Home Appliances Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Electrolux Group company.

Electrolux Group company employs more people globally than BSH Home Appliances Group company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Electrolux Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Electrolux Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Electrolux Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Electrolux Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Electrolux Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BSH Home Appliances Group nor Electrolux Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in qs (parse modules) allows HTTP DoS.This issue affects qs: < 6.14.1. SummaryThe arrayLimit option in qs does not enforce limits for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2), allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. Applications using arrayLimit for DoS protection are vulnerable. DetailsThe arrayLimit option only checks limits for indexed notation (a[0]=1&a[1]=2) but completely bypasses it for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2). Vulnerable code (lib/parse.js:159-162): if (root === '[]' && options.parseArrays) { obj = utils.combine([], leaf); // No arrayLimit check } Working code (lib/parse.js:175): else if (index <= options.arrayLimit) { // Limit checked here obj = []; obj[index] = leaf; } The bracket notation handler at line 159 uses utils.combine([], leaf) without validating against options.arrayLimit, while indexed notation at line 175 checks index <= options.arrayLimit before creating arrays. PoCTest 1 - Basic bypass: npm install qs const qs = require('qs'); const result = qs.parse('a[]=1&a[]=2&a[]=3&a[]=4&a[]=5&a[]=6', { arrayLimit: 5 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 6 (should be max 5) Test 2 - DoS demonstration: const qs = require('qs'); const attack = 'a[]=' + Array(10000).fill('x').join('&a[]='); const result = qs.parse(attack, { arrayLimit: 100 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 10000 (should be max 100) Configuration: * arrayLimit: 5 (test 1) or arrayLimit: 100 (test 2) * Use bracket notation: a[]=value (not indexed a[0]=value) ImpactDenial of Service via memory exhaustion. Affects applications using qs.parse() with user-controlled input and arrayLimit for protection. Attack scenario: * Attacker sends HTTP request: GET /api/search?filters[]=x&filters[]=x&...&filters[]=x (100,000+ times) * Application parses with qs.parse(query, { arrayLimit: 100 }) * qs ignores limit, parses all 100,000 elements into array * Server memory exhausted → application crashes or becomes unresponsive * Service unavailable for all users Real-world impact: * Single malicious request can crash server * No authentication required * Easy to automate and scale * Affects any endpoint parsing query strings with bracket notation

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /home/editfood.php. This manipulation of the argument a/b/c/d causes sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /home/editrefugee.php. The manipulation of the argument rfid results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Mobile Builder Mobile builder allows Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Mobile builder: from n/a through 1.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Hiroaki Miyashita Custom Field Template allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Custom Field Template: from n/a through 2.7.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L