Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Brown-FormanBrown-Forman
VS
Southern Glazer's Wine & SpiritsSouthern Glazer's Wine & Spirits
Brown-Forman

Brown-Forman

850 Dixie Hwy, Louisville, 40210, US

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.brown-forman.com
718/1000Moderate

Brown‑Forman Corporation is a global leader in the spirits industry, responsibly building exceptional beverage alcohol brands for more than 155 years. Headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, we are guided by our founding promise, “Nothing Better in the Market.” Our premi...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:4,733
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Miami, None, Miami, Florida, US, 33169

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
801/1000Good

Southern Glazer’s Wine & Spirits is the world’s pre-eminent distributor of beverage alcohol, and proud to be a multi-generational, family-owned company. We have operations in 47 states and Canada. We offer an array of careers focused on delivering a captivating and rewa...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:16,829
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Brown-Forman

Brown-Forman

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brown-Forman in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Brown-Forman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brown-Forman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Brown-Forman

Brown-Forman

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BRO281322
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BRO1772396670
🔒 Incident : Breach
BRO1000091725
Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Brown-Forman company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Brown-Forman company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Brown-Forman company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Brown-Forman company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Brown-Forman company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Brown-Forman company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Brown-Forman company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Brown-Forman company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Brown-Forman company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Brown-Forman company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Brown-Forman company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Brown-Forman and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Brown-Forman and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Brown-Forman or Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Brown-Forman or Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits ?
Between Brown-Forman and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Brown-Forman and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA