Comparison Overview

Brosnan Golf

VS

Kiefer Aquatics

Brosnan Golf

19 Radley St, 19 Radley St
Last Update: 2025-11-21

For over four decades, Brosnan Golf has proudly crafted a legacy of excellence in the Australian golfing scene. Our journey began in 1977 with a simple mission: to create exceptional golf products that inspire golfers to unleash their true potential. Today, we stand tall as a trusted brand offering a comprehensive range of premium golf products, including club packages and sets, buggies, shoes, balls, and accessories. Our rich history adds immense value and credibility, symbolising our unwavering commitment to quality, performance, and innovation.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kiefer Aquatics

903 Morrissey Dr, Bloomington, Illinois, US, 61701
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Kiefer Aquatics is the leading multi-channel distributor serving lifeguards, swim teams, swim facilities, and learn to swim programs in the U.S. market. Our portfolio of e-commerce and retail locations operate under our various brands and businesses which include: Kiefer, The Lifeguard Store, All-American Swim and Swim Shops of the Southwest. If you are interested in working at Kiefer and are passionate about swimming and serving customers, we'd like to talk to you. Please email us as [email protected]

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brosnan-golf-australia-pty-ltd.jpeg
Brosnan Golf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adolph-kiefer-&-associates.jpeg
Kiefer Aquatics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brosnan Golf
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kiefer Aquatics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brosnan Golf in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kiefer Aquatics in 2025.

Incident History — Brosnan Golf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brosnan Golf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kiefer Aquatics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kiefer Aquatics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brosnan-golf-australia-pty-ltd.jpeg
Brosnan Golf
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adolph-kiefer-&-associates.jpeg
Kiefer Aquatics
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: External System Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Brosnan Golf company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kiefer Aquatics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Kiefer Aquatics company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Brosnan Golf company has not reported any.

In the current year, Kiefer Aquatics company and Brosnan Golf company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kiefer Aquatics company nor Brosnan Golf company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Kiefer Aquatics company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Brosnan Golf company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Kiefer Aquatics company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Brosnan Golf company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Brosnan Golf company nor Kiefer Aquatics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brosnan Golf nor Kiefer Aquatics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Brosnan Golf company nor Kiefer Aquatics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kiefer Aquatics company employs more people globally than Brosnan Golf company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Brosnan Golf nor Kiefer Aquatics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brosnan Golf nor Kiefer Aquatics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brosnan Golf nor Kiefer Aquatics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brosnan Golf nor Kiefer Aquatics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brosnan Golf nor Kiefer Aquatics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brosnan Golf nor Kiefer Aquatics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H