Comparison Overview

Broomhead & Saul

VS

Sims & Campbell - Annapolis

Broomhead & Saul

11 Hammet Street, Taunton, Somerset, TA1 1RZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

At Broomhead & Saul we have been providing expert legal advice to a broad range of personal and business clients since 1895. Broomhead & Saul is based in offices in the heart of both Taunton and Ilminster and offers a full range of easily accessible legal services including advice on personal injury claims, children and family law issues, property, wills, trusts and estates and criminal law. Taunton Office 11 Hammet Street Taunton Somerset TA1 1RZ 01823 288121 Ilminster Office 11 & 13 East Street Ilminster Somerset TA19 0AE 01460 57056

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sims & Campbell - Annapolis

181 Truman Parkway, None, Annapolis, Maryland, US, 21401
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

At Sims & Campbell, our estate planning lawyers advise individuals and families on transferring wealth by will, trust or gift, administering estates, and pursuing or defending trust and estate litigation. The firm develops estate plans that help clients in all family situations provide for beneficiaries, minimize gift and estate taxes, preserve and protect assets, designate guardians of minor children, and benefit charitable organizations. Sims & Campbell provides guidance on complex trust and estate legal issues with common sense, clarity and human understanding. Our goal is to help you keep your property in the family so that it is preserved for future generations.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/broomhead-&-saul.jpeg
Broomhead & Saul
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/simscampbell.jpeg
Sims & Campbell - Annapolis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Broomhead & Saul
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sims & Campbell - Annapolis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Broomhead & Saul in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sims & Campbell - Annapolis in 2025.

Incident History — Broomhead & Saul (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Broomhead & Saul cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sims & Campbell - Annapolis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sims & Campbell - Annapolis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/broomhead-&-saul.jpeg
Broomhead & Saul
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/simscampbell.jpeg
Sims & Campbell - Annapolis
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Broomhead & Saul company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sims & Campbell - Annapolis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sims & Campbell - Annapolis company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Broomhead & Saul company has not reported any.

In the current year, Sims & Campbell - Annapolis company and Broomhead & Saul company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sims & Campbell - Annapolis company nor Broomhead & Saul company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sims & Campbell - Annapolis company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Broomhead & Saul company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sims & Campbell - Annapolis company nor Broomhead & Saul company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Broomhead & Saul company nor Sims & Campbell - Annapolis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Broomhead & Saul nor Sims & Campbell - Annapolis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Broomhead & Saul company nor Sims & Campbell - Annapolis company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sims & Campbell - Annapolis company employs more people globally than Broomhead & Saul company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Broomhead & Saul nor Sims & Campbell - Annapolis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Broomhead & Saul nor Sims & Campbell - Annapolis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Broomhead & Saul nor Sims & Campbell - Annapolis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Broomhead & Saul nor Sims & Campbell - Annapolis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Broomhead & Saul nor Sims & Campbell - Annapolis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Broomhead & Saul nor Sims & Campbell - Annapolis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X