Comparison Overview

Brook + Whittle

VS

hollandridderkerk

Brook + Whittle

20 Carter Dr, Guilford, Connecticut, 06437, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Brook + Whittle is a leading North American manufacturer of premium prime label solutions with highly differentiated capabilities, entrusted by some of the most well-known brands. The company provides pressure-sensitive labels, shrink sleeves, flexible packaging, and heat transfer labels with a focus on delivering value to customers through sustainable packaging, complex decoration, digitalization, and industry-leading lead times. Brook + Whittle operates fifteen production facilities across the US.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 461
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

hollandridderkerk

De Zelling 17, Hendrik-Ido-Ambacht, South Holland, NL, 3342 GS
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Hollandridderkerk is specialist in Printing On Demand, digitaal drukwerk en grootformaat prints. Daarbij verlenen wij allerlei aanvullende diensten zoals creatieve vormgeving, slimme automatisering en fulfilment. Wij staan voor bestelgemak, duurzaamheid en persoonlijke service. Of u nu opleider, uitgever, marketeer of retailer bent, bij Hollandridderkerk bent u voor al uw druk- en printwerk aan het juiste adres. Van enkele afdrukken tot volledige outsourcing.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brook-&-whittle-limited.jpeg
Brook + Whittle
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hollandridderkerk.jpeg
hollandridderkerk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brook + Whittle
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
hollandridderkerk
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brook + Whittle in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for hollandridderkerk in 2025.

Incident History — Brook + Whittle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brook + Whittle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — hollandridderkerk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

hollandridderkerk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brook-&-whittle-limited.jpeg
Brook + Whittle
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hollandridderkerk.jpeg
hollandridderkerk
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Brook + Whittle company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to hollandridderkerk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, hollandridderkerk company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Brook + Whittle company.

In the current year, hollandridderkerk company and Brook + Whittle company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither hollandridderkerk company nor Brook + Whittle company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither hollandridderkerk company nor Brook + Whittle company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither hollandridderkerk company nor Brook + Whittle company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brook + Whittle company nor hollandridderkerk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brook + Whittle nor hollandridderkerk holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Brook + Whittle company nor hollandridderkerk company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Brook + Whittle company employs more people globally than hollandridderkerk company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Brook + Whittle nor hollandridderkerk holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brook + Whittle nor hollandridderkerk holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brook + Whittle nor hollandridderkerk holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brook + Whittle nor hollandridderkerk holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brook + Whittle nor hollandridderkerk holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brook + Whittle nor hollandridderkerk holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N