Comparison Overview

Bronc Box

VS

Anta

Bronc Box

149 Harvest Dr, None, Coldwater, Ohio, US, 45828
Last Update: 2025-08-19 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
https://broncbox.com/

Excellent

Since 2015, the team at Signature 4 began their mission to develop our flagship product, the Bronc Box, with other gear and storage for hunting, weapons, and outdoor enthusiasts. The countless hours spent engineering, building, and testing reflects today in the quality product we make by our US-based, hard-working team in Ohio. We take pride in always doing the right thing, making storage gear at affordable prices without sacrificing quality, and delivering the best experience to every customer joining the Bronc family.

NAICS: 33992
NAICS Definition: Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Anta

ๅŽฆ้—จๆ€ๆ˜ŽๅŒบๅ˜‰ไน‰่ทฏ99ๅท ๅŽฆ้—จๅธ‚, ็ฆๅปบ็œ 361008, CN
Last Update: 2025-05-03 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000
http://www.anta.com

ANTA Group was founded in 1991 and officially launched the ANTA brand in 1994. It is a comprehensive sportswear company specializing in the design, production, marketing and operation of sportswear, accessories and other sports equipment. Over more than 28 years of development, ANTA has transformed from a traditional private company into a public company that is able to compete internationally and has a modern corporate governance structure, as well as the largest sportswear conglomerate in China. In 2019, ANTA Group entered into "the coordination and value year" with the goal of achieving over 100 billion Yuan of its turnover by 2025 and becoming a respected world-class multi-brand sportswear conglomerate. In 2016, ANTA Group determined the development strategy of "Single-Focus, Multi-Brand and Omni-Channel". In March 2019, ANTA Group announced it has initially realized the acquisition of Amer Sports, a Finnish company. In 2018, ANTA Group achieved a revenue of 24.1 billion Yuan, a turnover of more than 40 billion Yuan and an annual sales of over 70 million pairs of sports shoes and over 100 million pieces of clothing. By August 2018, ANTA's market value had exceeded HK$ 120 billion, ranking the third of the world in the industry. By the first half of 2018, ANTA had paid taxes of over 20 billion Yuan and created more than 100,000 jobs directly and more than 200,000 jobs indirectly.

NAICS: 33992
NAICS Definition: Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bronc-box.jpeg
Bronc Box
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anta.jpeg
Anta
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Bronc Box
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Anta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bronc Box in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anta in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Bronc Box (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bronc Box cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Anta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bronc-box.jpeg
Bronc Box
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anta.jpeg
Anta
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Bronc Box company and Anta company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Anta company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bronc Box company.

In the current year, Anta company and Bronc Box company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Anta company nor Bronc Box company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Anta company nor Bronc Box company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Anta company nor Bronc Box company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bronc Box company nor Anta company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Anta company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bronc Box company.

Neither Bronc Box company nor Anta company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References