Comparison Overview

Brock & Scott, PLLC

VS

Cassin & Cassin LLP

Brock & Scott, PLLC

1315 Westbrook Plaza Drive, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC is a full service law firm with extensive experience serving the financial sector. With offices across a 20 state footprint, we deliver legal service with the utmost integrity and operational efficiency through our highly skilled team of attorneys and support staff. PRACTICE AREAS: Appellate, Bankruptcy & Creditors'​ Rights, Landlord Tenant Default, Project & Staffing Services, Litigation & Defense, Real Estate Default, Real Estate Law, Special Assets Resolution and Title Curative. EXPERIENCE Brock & Scott has an extensive range of practice areas led by attorneys and staff with a trusted business perspective to help our clients reach their goals. EFFICIENCY Reputation for quality combined with the technical tools necessary to deliver results stems from our understanding of what clients need. INTEGRITY Clients have confidence in us because we invest ourselves in their business and needs enabling us to provide superior solutions and results. Proudly serving AL, CT, FL, GA, KY, ME, MD, MA, MI, NH, NJ, NC, OH, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VT and VA.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 561
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cassin & Cassin LLP

711 Third Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY, US, 10017
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Cassin & Cassin LLP, a law firm with three offices in New York City, Purchase, NY and Phoenix, AZ, has nearly four decades of experience providing the highest quality of service to our clients. Our attorneys focus on real estate law, representing lending institutions, investment funds, developers, small to medium size companies in all aspects of financing, buying, selling, leasing and development. In addition, our well-established Trusts & Estates practice advises individuals on estate planning and administration, residential real estate financing and the formation of limited liability companies and private foundations.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 120
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brock-&-scott-pllc.jpeg
Brock & Scott, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cassin-&-cassin-llp.jpeg
Cassin & Cassin LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brock & Scott, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cassin & Cassin LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brock & Scott, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cassin & Cassin LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Brock & Scott, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brock & Scott, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cassin & Cassin LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cassin & Cassin LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brock-&-scott-pllc.jpeg
Brock & Scott, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cassin-&-cassin-llp.jpeg
Cassin & Cassin LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Brock & Scott, PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cassin & Cassin LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cassin & Cassin LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Brock & Scott, PLLC company.

In the current year, Cassin & Cassin LLP company and Brock & Scott, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cassin & Cassin LLP company nor Brock & Scott, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cassin & Cassin LLP company nor Brock & Scott, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cassin & Cassin LLP company nor Brock & Scott, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brock & Scott, PLLC company nor Cassin & Cassin LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brock & Scott, PLLC nor Cassin & Cassin LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Brock & Scott, PLLC company nor Cassin & Cassin LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Brock & Scott, PLLC company employs more people globally than Cassin & Cassin LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Brock & Scott, PLLC nor Cassin & Cassin LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brock & Scott, PLLC nor Cassin & Cassin LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brock & Scott, PLLC nor Cassin & Cassin LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brock & Scott, PLLC nor Cassin & Cassin LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brock & Scott, PLLC nor Cassin & Cassin LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brock & Scott, PLLC nor Cassin & Cassin LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X