Comparison Overview

Broadridge

VS

Nomura

Broadridge

605 3rd Ave, 41st Floor, New York, New York, US, 10158
Last Update: 2026-01-16
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.broadridge.com

Broadridge Financial Solutions (NYSE: BR) is a global technology leader with the trusted expertise and transformative technology to help clients and the financial services industry operate, innovate, and grow. We power investing, governance, and communications for our clients – driving operational resiliency, elevating business performance, and transforming investor experiences. Our technology and operations platforms process and generate over 7 billion communications per year and underpin the daily trading of more than $10 trillion of securities globally. A certified Great Place to Work®, Broadridge is part of the S&P 500® Index, employing over 14,000 associates in 21 countries. For more information, please visit www.broadridge.com.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 16,809
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Nomura

1-9-1 Nihonbashi, Tokyo, 103-8645, JP
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nomura.com

Nomura is a financial services group with an integrated global network. By connecting markets East & West, Nomura services the needs of individuals, institutions, corporates and governments through its four business divisions: Wealth Management, Investment Management, Wholesale (Global Markets and Investment Banking), and Banking. Founded in 1925, the firm is built on a tradition of disciplined entrepreneurship, serving clients with creative solutions and considered thought leadership.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 16,105
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/broadridge-financial-solutions.jpeg
Broadridge
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nomura.jpeg
Nomura
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Broadridge
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nomura
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Broadridge in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nomura in 2026.

Incident History — Broadridge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Broadridge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nomura (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nomura cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/broadridge-financial-solutions.jpeg
Broadridge
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nomura.jpeg
Nomura
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Broadridge company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nomura company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Nomura company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Broadridge company has not reported any.

In the current year, Nomura company and Broadridge company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nomura company nor Broadridge company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nomura company nor Broadridge company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nomura company nor Broadridge company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Broadridge company nor Nomura company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Broadridge nor Nomura holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Broadridge company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Nomura company.

Broadridge company employs more people globally than Nomura company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Broadridge nor Nomura holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Broadridge nor Nomura holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Broadridge nor Nomura holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Broadridge nor Nomura holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Broadridge nor Nomura holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Broadridge nor Nomura holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References