Comparison Overview

BRIXEN & SONS, Inc.

VS

Xpress Labels Limited

BRIXEN & SONS, Inc.

2100 S FAIRVIEW ST, SANTA ANA, California, 92704, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://brixen.com

Brixen & Sons is one of the premier providers of custom in-store graphics and point-of-purchase advertising and visual displays in the USA. Founded in 1992, we've enjoyed over 25 years of successful partnerships; providing visual solutions to high-end fashion retailers, shopping and entertainment venues, and grocery chains, in the USA and Canada. In addition to our core services of large-format digital and screen printing, we also offer in-house laser & CNC cutting capabilities, custom fabrication, and complete fulfillment services.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Xpress Labels Limited

Anglo Business Park, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP19 8UP, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.xpresslabels.com

Xpress Labels is an innovative self adhesive label manufacturing company located in Aylesbury Buckinghamshire, that can deliver a world class solution for any labelling requirement. Since our incorporation in 2000 our continued growth has been built on our reputation for supplying our customers on time, in full, every time, We pride ourselves on our exceptional quality, superior customer service and sensible lead times. Xpress has now concluded our capex programme for 2018 that has seen us upgrade our printing, pre-press and finishing equipment – this complementing our existing flexo and digital (inkjet) capabilities. In support of these investments we are also implementing a closed loop colour control standard with additional investment in the latest anilox cleaning, ink mixing/dispensing and colour certification software and hardware. This combined with our use of the Kodak NX plate and Apex GTT anilox technology will allow us to provide our customers with the highest quality print regardless of their requirements.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brixen-&-sons-inc.jpeg
BRIXEN & SONS, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xpress-labels.jpeg
Xpress Labels Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BRIXEN & SONS, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Xpress Labels Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xpress Labels Limited in 2025.

Incident History — BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Xpress Labels Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xpress Labels Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brixen-&-sons-inc.jpeg
BRIXEN & SONS, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xpress-labels.jpeg
Xpress Labels Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Xpress Labels Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Xpress Labels Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. company.

In the current year, Xpress Labels Limited company and BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Xpress Labels Limited company nor BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Xpress Labels Limited company nor BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Xpress Labels Limited company nor BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. company nor Xpress Labels Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. nor Xpress Labels Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. company nor Xpress Labels Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Xpress Labels Limited company employs more people globally than BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. nor Xpress Labels Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. nor Xpress Labels Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. nor Xpress Labels Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. nor Xpress Labels Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. nor Xpress Labels Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BRIXEN & SONS, Inc. nor Xpress Labels Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References