Comparison Overview

British Online Archives (BOA)

VS

Cognella

British Online Archives (BOA)

Main Street, East Ardsley, Wakefield , West Yorkshire, WF3 2AP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26

British Online Archives is one of the United Kingdom’s leading academic publishers. Our goal is to provide students and researchers in the humanities and social sciences with access to unique collections of primary source documents. To this end, our website hosts over 5 million records drawn from both private and public archives. These records are organised thematically, covering 1,000 years of world history, from politics and warfare to slavery and medicine.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cognella

3970 Sorrento Valley Blvd, San Diego, CA, 92124, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Cognella® is redefining academic publishing by creating teacher-driven, student-centric higher education course materials in print and digital formats under three imprints: Cognella® Academic Publishing, Cognella® Custom, and Cognella® Active Learning. At Cognella, we believe quality academic publishing is about providing students with highly relevant, affordable learning materials. For over 25 years, Cognella has redefined the academic publishing industry by producing instructor-driven, student-centric learning materials for the higher education market. We collaborate with instructors and professionals to publish anthologies, original works, custom course materials, and interactive online learning activities that support learning objectives and provide students with authentic educational experiences.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-online-archives.jpeg
British Online Archives (BOA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cognella.jpeg
Cognella
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
British Online Archives (BOA)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cognella
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for British Online Archives (BOA) in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cognella in 2025.

Incident History — British Online Archives (BOA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

British Online Archives (BOA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cognella (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cognella cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-online-archives.jpeg
British Online Archives (BOA)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cognella.jpeg
Cognella
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cognella company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to British Online Archives (BOA) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cognella company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to British Online Archives (BOA) company.

In the current year, Cognella company and British Online Archives (BOA) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cognella company nor British Online Archives (BOA) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cognella company nor British Online Archives (BOA) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cognella company nor British Online Archives (BOA) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither British Online Archives (BOA) company nor Cognella company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither British Online Archives (BOA) nor Cognella holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither British Online Archives (BOA) company nor Cognella company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cognella company employs more people globally than British Online Archives (BOA) company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither British Online Archives (BOA) nor Cognella holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither British Online Archives (BOA) nor Cognella holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither British Online Archives (BOA) nor Cognella holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither British Online Archives (BOA) nor Cognella holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither British Online Archives (BOA) nor Cognella holds HIPAA certification.

Neither British Online Archives (BOA) nor Cognella holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.