Comparison Overview

British Journal of Hospital Medicine

VS

The Cybersecurity Law Report

British Journal of Hospital Medicine

St Judes Church, Herne Hill, SE24 0PB, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

British Journal of Hospital Medicine is the leading monthly multi-specialty review journal for hospital doctors. The journal has been at the forefront of medical education for over 50 years, publishing only the best and most authoritative clinical reviews, symposia, editorials and case reports available to doctors. We also publish quality improvement projects and completed audits which follow the Squire guidelines. All articles are concise, fully referenced, presented in an easy-to-read format and peer-reviewed by some of the world's leading international authorities. British Journal of Hospital Medicine covers all specialties in hospital medicine, making it essential reading for doctors of all grades who want to ensure that their practice is evidence-based and up-to-date with all the latest clinical developments. The Core Training for Doctors section of British Journal of Hospital Medicine is intended to provide clinical information in an easily accessible format to doctors in training. Articles cover Clinical skills for postgraduate examinations, What you need to know about, Tips from the shop floor or What they don't teach you in medical school. The journal is relevant at every stage of a doctor's career, and offers beneficial subscription rates for student doctors. It is indexed on Medline, CINAHL and the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Cybersecurity Law Report

330 Hudson Street, New York, 10013, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

The Cybersecurity Law Report is an information service that provides business analysis of critical legal issues related to the cybersecurity, data protection and data privacy challenges facing entities across industries. Each Report contains guidance on compliance strategies and best business practices to assist outside and in-house counsel and compliance professionals with the dynamic issues unfolding in this area. We're in the business of helping in-house counsel and compliance professionals protect vital information and comply with evolving state, federal and industry regulatory requirements while enhancing their bottom line. The Cybersecurity Law Report is part of The Law Report Group, which is owned by the Mergermarket Group, a leader in global financial intelligence.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-journal-of-hospital-medicine.jpeg
British Journal of Hospital Medicine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-cybersecurity-law-report.jpeg
The Cybersecurity Law Report
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
British Journal of Hospital Medicine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Cybersecurity Law Report
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for British Journal of Hospital Medicine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Cybersecurity Law Report in 2025.

Incident History — British Journal of Hospital Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

British Journal of Hospital Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Cybersecurity Law Report (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Cybersecurity Law Report cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-journal-of-hospital-medicine.jpeg
British Journal of Hospital Medicine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-cybersecurity-law-report.jpeg
The Cybersecurity Law Report
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

British Journal of Hospital Medicine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Cybersecurity Law Report company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Cybersecurity Law Report company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to British Journal of Hospital Medicine company.

In the current year, The Cybersecurity Law Report company and British Journal of Hospital Medicine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Cybersecurity Law Report company nor British Journal of Hospital Medicine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Cybersecurity Law Report company nor British Journal of Hospital Medicine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Cybersecurity Law Report company nor British Journal of Hospital Medicine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither British Journal of Hospital Medicine company nor The Cybersecurity Law Report company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither British Journal of Hospital Medicine nor The Cybersecurity Law Report holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Cybersecurity Law Report company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to British Journal of Hospital Medicine company.

Neither British Journal of Hospital Medicine nor The Cybersecurity Law Report holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither British Journal of Hospital Medicine nor The Cybersecurity Law Report holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither British Journal of Hospital Medicine nor The Cybersecurity Law Report holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither British Journal of Hospital Medicine nor The Cybersecurity Law Report holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither British Journal of Hospital Medicine nor The Cybersecurity Law Report holds HIPAA certification.

Neither British Journal of Hospital Medicine nor The Cybersecurity Law Report holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.