Comparison Overview

British GQ

VS

Local Profile

British GQ

Hanover Square, London, England, W1S 1FN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gq.co.uk

For more than 30 years, GQ has been the premier men’s magazine, providing intelligent coverage of style, culture, politics, lifestyle and more. Each month on the magazine, and daily on the website, we work with the finest photographers, and a stable of award-winning writers, to deliver stand-out stories that you need to read now.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Local Profile

1413 Gables Court, Plano, 75075, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.localprofile.com

Local Profile of Collin County connects our communities, leveraging the incredible power of print, digital and events to tell the stories that drive meaningful conversation and action, bringing us closer together. Join us as we explore all the incredible things, people, and stories our local community has to offer. Explore Local. Be Local. Love Local.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-gq.jpeg
British GQ
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/localprofile.jpeg
Local Profile
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
British GQ
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Local Profile
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for British GQ in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Local Profile in 2025.

Incident History — British GQ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

British GQ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Local Profile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Local Profile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-gq.jpeg
British GQ
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/localprofile.jpeg
Local Profile
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

British GQ company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Local Profile company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Local Profile company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to British GQ company.

In the current year, Local Profile company and British GQ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Local Profile company nor British GQ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Local Profile company nor British GQ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Local Profile company nor British GQ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither British GQ company nor Local Profile company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither British GQ nor Local Profile holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither British GQ company nor Local Profile company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

British GQ company employs more people globally than Local Profile company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither British GQ nor Local Profile holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither British GQ nor Local Profile holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither British GQ nor Local Profile holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither British GQ nor Local Profile holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither British GQ nor Local Profile holds HIPAA certification.

Neither British GQ nor Local Profile holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References