Comparison Overview

British Film Institute (BFI)

VS

Motion Picture Association

British Film Institute (BFI)

21 Stephen Street, London, W1T 1LN, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

We are a cultural charity, a National Lottery distributor, and the UK's lead organisation for film and the moving image. Funded by the UK Government. Our mission is: • To support creativity and actively seek out the next generation of UK storytellers • To grow and care for the BFI National Archive, the world’s largest film and television archive • To offer the widest range of UK and international moving image culture through our programmes and festivals — delivered online and in venue • To use our knowledge to educate and deepen public appreciation and understanding of film and the moving image • To work with Government and industry to ensure the continued growth of the UK’s screen industries Founded in 1933, the BFI is a registered charity governed by Royal Charter. The BFI Board of Governors is chaired by Jay Hunt.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,040
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Motion Picture Association

1600 I St NW, Washington, 20006, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19

We are the leading advocate of the film, television, and streaming industry around the world. The MPA works in every corner of the globe to advance the creative industry, protect our members’ content across all screens, defend the creative and artistic freedoms of storytellers, and support innovative distribution models that bring an expansion of viewing choices to audiences around the world. Our member studios are: Netflix Studios, LLC; Paramount Pictures Corporation; Prime Video and Amazon MGM Studios; Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.; Universal City Studios LLC; Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures; and Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 442
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-film-institute.jpeg
British Film Institute (BFI)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mpa.jpeg
Motion Picture Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
British Film Institute (BFI)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Motion Picture Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for British Film Institute (BFI) in 2025.

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Motion Picture Association in 2025.

Incident History — British Film Institute (BFI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

British Film Institute (BFI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Motion Picture Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motion Picture Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-film-institute.jpeg
British Film Institute (BFI)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mpa.jpeg
Motion Picture Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

British Film Institute (BFI) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Motion Picture Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Motion Picture Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to British Film Institute (BFI) company.

In the current year, Motion Picture Association company and British Film Institute (BFI) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Motion Picture Association company nor British Film Institute (BFI) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Motion Picture Association company nor British Film Institute (BFI) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Motion Picture Association company nor British Film Institute (BFI) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither British Film Institute (BFI) company nor Motion Picture Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither British Film Institute (BFI) nor Motion Picture Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither British Film Institute (BFI) company nor Motion Picture Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

British Film Institute (BFI) company employs more people globally than Motion Picture Association company, reflecting its scale as a Movies, Videos, and Sound.

Neither British Film Institute (BFI) nor Motion Picture Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither British Film Institute (BFI) nor Motion Picture Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither British Film Institute (BFI) nor Motion Picture Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither British Film Institute (BFI) nor Motion Picture Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither British Film Institute (BFI) nor Motion Picture Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither British Film Institute (BFI) nor Motion Picture Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N