Comparison Overview

Aerospace Bristol

VS

Tacoma Art Museum

Aerospace Bristol

Hayes Way, Patchway, BS34 5BZ, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aerospacebristol.org

Aerospace Bristol is a new industrial heritage museum in Filton that inspires and entertains today's and future generations through the stories and achievements of Bristol’s aerospace industry - past, present and future. Open now, the museum's show-stopping centrepiece is Concorde Alpha Foxtrot. Designed, built and tested in Bristol, she was the last Concorde to be built and the last to fly. The new museum has been planned by the Bristol Aero Collection Trust and has significant support from BAE Systems, Airbus, Rolls-Royce, South Gloucestershire Council and the Heritage Lottery Fund.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tacoma Art Museum

1701 Pacific Avenue, Tacoma, WA, 98402-3214, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tacomaartmuseum.org

About Tacoma Art Museum Tacoma Art Museum is a public-spirited institution that champions a dynamic and complex approach to exhibitions. The museum’s passionate staff are driven by the mission of connecting people through art, empowering visitors to create meaning with artworks through innovative interpretive and programming strategies. Named by USA Today as one of the “Top 10 Great Places to See Art in Smaller Cities,” the museum has developed a reputation for presenting art in a thought-provoking yet accessible manner with a strong commitment to Northwest art. Founded in 1935, TAM has strong roots in the community. Along with five other nearby museums and neighboring University of Washington at Tacoma, TAM anchors Tacoma’s lively downtown core.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bristol-aero-collection.jpeg
Aerospace Bristol
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tacoma-art-museum.jpeg
Tacoma Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aerospace Bristol
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tacoma Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aerospace Bristol in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tacoma Art Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Aerospace Bristol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aerospace Bristol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tacoma Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tacoma Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bristol-aero-collection.jpeg
Aerospace Bristol
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tacoma-art-museum.jpeg
Tacoma Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Aerospace Bristol company and Tacoma Art Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Tacoma Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aerospace Bristol company.

In the current year, Tacoma Art Museum company and Aerospace Bristol company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tacoma Art Museum company nor Aerospace Bristol company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tacoma Art Museum company nor Aerospace Bristol company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tacoma Art Museum company nor Aerospace Bristol company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aerospace Bristol company nor Tacoma Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aerospace Bristol nor Tacoma Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aerospace Bristol company nor Tacoma Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tacoma Art Museum company employs more people globally than Aerospace Bristol company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Aerospace Bristol nor Tacoma Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aerospace Bristol nor Tacoma Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aerospace Bristol nor Tacoma Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aerospace Bristol nor Tacoma Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aerospace Bristol nor Tacoma Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aerospace Bristol nor Tacoma Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References