Comparison Overview

BrightSpring Health Services

VS

Baylor Scott & White Health

BrightSpring Health Services

805 N Whittington Pkwy, Louisville, Kentucky, US, 40222
Last Update: 2025-11-20

BrightSpring is the parent company of a family of services and brands that provides clinical, nonclinical, pharmacy and ancillary care services for people of all ages, health and skill levels across home and community settings. The company is a leading provider of diversified home and community-based health and pharmacy services to medically complex and high-need populations. Its primary businesses include: behavioral health (including autism services), home health care (including personal care, home health, and hospice), neuro therapy, and job placement and vocational training, supported by pharmacy and telecare ancillary technologies and services. These businesses employ over 37,000 dedicated full-time equivalent team members in 50 states and provide services for over 350,000 people every day. BrightSpring is focused on providing quality outcomes and solutions through best-in-class services and investments in people, process and technology innovation, including the development of its Connected Home model of care. Founded and headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, the company has been making a difference in communities since 1974 – helping people live their best life.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,701
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Baylor Scott & White Health

3500 Gaston Ave, Dallas, Texas, 75246, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

With us by your side, there's no stopping you. It's why we're creating a new kind of healthcare at Baylor Scott & White. And we're just getting started. As the largest not-for-profit health system in the state of Texas, Baylor Scott & White promotes the health and well-being of every individual, family and community it serves. It is committed to making quality care more accessible, convenient and affordable through its integrated delivery network, which includes the Baylor Scott & White Health Plan, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, the Baylor Scott & White Quality Alliance and its leading digital health platform — MyBSWHealth. Through 52 hospitals and more than 1,300 access points, including flagship academic medical centers in Dallas, Fort Worth and Temple, the system offers the full continuum of care, from primary to award-winning specialty care. Founded as a Christian ministry of healing more than a century ago, Baylor Scott & White today serves more than three million Texans. For more information visit: BSWHealth.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 28,429
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brightspringhealth.jpeg
BrightSpring Health Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bswhealth.jpeg
Baylor Scott & White Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BrightSpring Health Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baylor Scott & White Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BrightSpring Health Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baylor Scott & White Health in 2025.

Incident History — BrightSpring Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BrightSpring Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Baylor Scott & White Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baylor Scott & White Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brightspringhealth.jpeg
BrightSpring Health Services
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bswhealth.jpeg
Baylor Scott & White Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baylor Scott & White Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BrightSpring Health Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BrightSpring Health Services company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Baylor Scott & White Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, Baylor Scott & White Health company and BrightSpring Health Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Baylor Scott & White Health company nor BrightSpring Health Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

BrightSpring Health Services company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Baylor Scott & White Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Baylor Scott & White Health company nor BrightSpring Health Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BrightSpring Health Services company nor Baylor Scott & White Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BrightSpring Health Services nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BrightSpring Health Services company nor Baylor Scott & White Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Baylor Scott & White Health company employs more people globally than BrightSpring Health Services company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither BrightSpring Health Services nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BrightSpring Health Services nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BrightSpring Health Services nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BrightSpring Health Services nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BrightSpring Health Services nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BrightSpring Health Services nor Baylor Scott & White Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H