Comparison Overview

Bright Red Publishing

VS

Aquaculture Magazine

Bright Red Publishing

1 Torphichen Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8HX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Bright Red offer the brightest and freshest Study Guides for Scotland’s students and teachers! At Bright Red we are passionate about producing accessible, contemporary and engaging materials of the highest quality for Scotland‘s students and teachers. One of the ways we achieve this high quality is to work with the very best publishing and educational professionals to produce truly exceptional resources.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aquaculture Magazine

203 S Saint Marys St, None, San Antonio, TX, US, 78205
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Aquaculture Magazine serves as a premier media agency dedicated to enhancing B2B sales for companies within the global aquaculture sector. We offer comprehensive demand generation marketing campaigns designed to boost our clients' sales. Our services include detailed market research to create compelling content that resonates with the target audiences of our clients. We guide potential leads through the buying journey, increasing their engagement and conversion rates. By nurturing these leads and aligning our strategies with their purchasing intentions, we significantly enhance our clients' sales performance. Aquaculture Magazine has been a pioneering publication in the global aquaculture industry since 1968. Based in San Antonio, Texas, it boasts audited distribution across all five continents. The magazine covers a wide range of topics, including fish and shrimp farming, processing, breeding, and raising aquatic species such as tilapia, trout, salmon, shrimp, catfish, crayfish, oysters, hybrid striped bass, and shellfish. It addresses various issues, including pond management, diseases, market trends, farm stocking, recirculating systems, statistics, selling, nutrition, feed, and seafood processing. The magazine primarily focuses on the U.S. and Canadian aquaculture industries, with significant attention to international markets, particularly in Southeast Asia, Bangladesh, India, and the Middle East. Aquaculture Magazine has a substantial reach, with over 60,000 readers and followers on its social networks and digital platforms.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bright-red-publishing.jpeg
Bright Red Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aquaculture-magazine.jpeg
Aquaculture Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bright Red Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aquaculture Magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bright Red Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aquaculture Magazine in 2025.

Incident History — Bright Red Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bright Red Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aquaculture Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aquaculture Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bright-red-publishing.jpeg
Bright Red Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aquaculture-magazine.jpeg
Aquaculture Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Bright Red Publishing company and Aquaculture Magazine company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Aquaculture Magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bright Red Publishing company.

In the current year, Aquaculture Magazine company and Bright Red Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aquaculture Magazine company nor Bright Red Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aquaculture Magazine company nor Bright Red Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aquaculture Magazine company nor Bright Red Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bright Red Publishing company nor Aquaculture Magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bright Red Publishing nor Aquaculture Magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bright Red Publishing company nor Aquaculture Magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Aquaculture Magazine company employs more people globally than Bright Red Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Bright Red Publishing nor Aquaculture Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bright Red Publishing nor Aquaculture Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bright Red Publishing nor Aquaculture Magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bright Red Publishing nor Aquaculture Magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bright Red Publishing nor Aquaculture Magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bright Red Publishing nor Aquaculture Magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.