Comparison Overview

Brigham Young University

VS

Laureate Education, Inc.

Brigham Young University

Main Campus, Provo, UT, US, 84602
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://byu.edu

We believe a world yearning for hope and joy needs the graduates of Brigham Young University—disciples of Jesus Christ who are driven by love for God and His children and who are prepared to serve and lead. This preparation demands a unique university model: at BYU, belief enhances inquiry, study amplifies faith, and revelation leads to rich understanding; at BYU, helping students develop their full divine potential is central to both our teaching and our scholarship. As the flagship higher education institution of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, BYU strives to be among the exceptional universities in the world and an essential university for the world.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 16,614
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Laureate Education, Inc.

601 Brickell Key Dr, Suite 700, Miami, Florida, US, 33131
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 750 and 799
http://www.laureate.net

For more than 20 years, we have remained committed to making a positive impact in the communities we serve, by providing accessible, high-quality undergraduate, graduate, and specialized degree programs. We know that when our students succeed, countries prosper, and societies benefit. We take very seriously our role in imparting knowledge and developing the skills of our students so they may become passionate changemakers. Whether through our student-led health clinics that offer free or low-cost services, or the faculty, staff, and students who have received national and global recognition for their social impact, collectively, we are delivering enduring positive change.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 38,878
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brigham-young-university.jpeg
Brigham Young University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laureate-education.jpeg
Laureate Education, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brigham Young University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Laureate Education, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brigham Young University in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laureate Education, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Brigham Young University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brigham Young University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Laureate Education, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laureate Education, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brigham-young-university.jpeg
Brigham Young University
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2012
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Email
Motivation: Accidental
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laureate-education.jpeg
Laureate Education, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Brigham Young University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Laureate Education, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Brigham Young University company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Laureate Education, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Laureate Education, Inc. company and Brigham Young University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Laureate Education, Inc. company nor Brigham Young University company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Laureate Education, Inc. company nor Brigham Young University company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Laureate Education, Inc. company nor Brigham Young University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brigham Young University company nor Laureate Education, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brigham Young University nor Laureate Education, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Brigham Young University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Laureate Education, Inc. company.

Laureate Education, Inc. company employs more people globally than Brigham Young University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Brigham Young University nor Laureate Education, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brigham Young University nor Laureate Education, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brigham Young University nor Laureate Education, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brigham Young University nor Laureate Education, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brigham Young University nor Laureate Education, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brigham Young University nor Laureate Education, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References