Comparison Overview

Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company

VS

RiverPrint

Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company

5300 N. Channel Ave., Portland, Oregon, 97217, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bridgetown.com

Bridgetown Printing of Portland, Oregon is a full-service Portland union printing facility that specializes in high-end sheetfed offset & digital printing with complete bindery, mailing and fulfillment services, but we go beyond the traditional definition of a commercial printer. As a part of the RR Donnelley network, we create value by delivering end-to-end print production and management solutions that are based on the needs of our customers to fuel growth, reduce costs and mitigate risks. How could you leverage our network and unparalleled capabilities to create value for your organization?

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

RiverPrint

1069 West 27th Street Suite A, Ogden, Utah, 84401, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.riverprint451.com

RiverPrint is a commercial printer with client relationships that extend for 30 plus years. We specialize in providing design and marketing services for small to medium size companies. This includes creating direct mail promotions, post cards, door hangers, brochures and business cards. Our marketing efforts assures coordination of new cross media efforts with print and direct marketing efforts. Production of either short run, digital full color printing or 300lpi offset printing is utilized based on the time frame and the type of project needs our clients have. We provide personalized customer service, along with quality printing and on-time delivery. Small business throughout Northern Utah have come to rely on us in meeting their business printing needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridgetown-printing.jpeg
Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/river-printing-company-inc.jpeg
RiverPrint
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RiverPrint
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RiverPrint in 2025.

Incident History — Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RiverPrint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RiverPrint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridgetown-printing.jpeg
Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/river-printing-company-inc.jpeg
RiverPrint
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RiverPrint company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RiverPrint company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company.

In the current year, RiverPrint company and Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RiverPrint company nor Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RiverPrint company nor Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RiverPrint company nor Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company nor RiverPrint company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company nor RiverPrint holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company nor RiverPrint company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company company employs more people globally than RiverPrint company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company nor RiverPrint holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company nor RiverPrint holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company nor RiverPrint holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company nor RiverPrint holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company nor RiverPrint holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bridgetown Printing, An RR Donnelley Company nor RiverPrint holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References