Comparison Overview

Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc.

VS

L&S Printing Company

Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc.

662 Silver Street, Agawam, Massachusetts, 01001-2987, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bnbindery.com

At Bridgeport National Bindery, we've made books one at a time for nearly 70 years. The idea that each book deserves individual attention and care remains essential to us. We embrace and adapt to rapidly changing technology and constantly strive to make better books, faster. BNB seamlessly integrates today's electronic ordering and on-demand digital printing with our traditional standard of quality. We continue to offer numerous products, services and workflows to meet your needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

L&S Printing Company

Hazelwood Close, Worthing, West Sussex, BN14 8NP, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ls-printing.com

The Craft of printing We have a strong heritage of producing and printing premium quality items for some of the country’s most well known organisations and institutions. From your concept to your artwork to your doorstep, your warehouse or your shop shelves We look after all your print production services under one roof. We streamline the print process by cutting out the middle men and all the unnecessary suppliers. You might want to take advantage of our online proofing and management services. We live and breathe production and printing We work 24/7 to take care of your time-critical tasks. We’re always at the other end of the phone to keep you up-to-date on your jobs progress, or you can track your project online. The cutting edge of print design We’re constantly increasing the speed and quality of the work we do for you by continually investing in state-of-the-art technologies. Come and visit us to have a look around.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridgeport-national-bindery.jpeg
Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l&s-printing-company.jpeg
L&S Printing Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
L&S Printing Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L&S Printing Company in 2025.

Incident History — Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — L&S Printing Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&S Printing Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridgeport-national-bindery.jpeg
Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l&s-printing-company.jpeg
L&S Printing Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to L&S Printing Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, L&S Printing Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company.

In the current year, L&S Printing Company company and Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither L&S Printing Company company nor Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither L&S Printing Company company nor Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither L&S Printing Company company nor Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company nor L&S Printing Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. nor L&S Printing Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company nor L&S Printing Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

L&S Printing Company company employs more people globally than Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. nor L&S Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. nor L&S Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. nor L&S Printing Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. nor L&S Printing Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. nor L&S Printing Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bridgeport National Bindery, Inc. nor L&S Printing Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References