Comparison Overview

Bridge Engineering Company

VS

Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC

Bridge Engineering Company

Behind Wazirabadi Octroi Post, Gujranwala, Punjab, 52290, PK
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Ibrahim Group was founded in 1992 has grown to be a leading producer/supplier of materials handling products like rollers/idlers and pulleys for heavy duty belt conveyors with profound/approved quality statistics including FEED Engineering to stamp a better yard in market. The Ibrahim Group's strengths include: Family owned company with more than 20 years experience in Manufacturing and marketing of components for Materials handling industries; More than 120 employees in 2 manufacturing companies and 3 sales points; Global approach with strong presence in Pakistan, Middle East; Significant investment in own R&D, technologies and quality systems; Largest range of rollers and pulleys of any supplier globally; Strategic focus on building up local service center to support your business;

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC

9 Washington Street, Rutland, Vermont, 05702, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC is a mechanical/electrical consulting engineering firm servicing municipal, commercial, institutional and industrial clients throughout Vermont and the surrounding New England Area. Daniel Dupras, P.E. (mechanical) and Claus Bartenstein, P.E., LEED-AP (electrical) have partnered to establish this engineering firm in 2010 and together bring almost 50 years of engineering experience to the new firm. "Service" is the main goal of the firm to set itself apart from the competition; responsiveness to our clients is our objective.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridge-engineering-company.jpeg
Bridge Engineering Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engineering-services-of-vermont-llc.jpeg
Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bridge Engineering Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bridge Engineering Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Bridge Engineering Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bridge Engineering Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridge-engineering-company.jpeg
Bridge Engineering Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engineering-services-of-vermont-llc.jpeg
Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bridge Engineering Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bridge Engineering Company company.

In the current year, Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC company and Bridge Engineering Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC company nor Bridge Engineering Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC company nor Bridge Engineering Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC company nor Bridge Engineering Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company company nor Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company nor Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company company nor Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bridge Engineering Company company employs more people globally than Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company nor Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company nor Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company nor Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company nor Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company nor Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company nor Engineering Services of Vermont, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H