Comparison Overview

Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting

VS

Applied Automation (UK) Ltd

Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting

30 Raglan Road, Auburn, 2144, AU
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bmabelting.com.au

Brendma is the largest 100% family owned and operated light weight conveyor belting specialists in Australia. When you work with Brendma, you can be sure you’ll get the right solution for your needs. Since we are an independent Australian owned company, you are not restricted to the limited range provided by any single foreign-owned company. You are free to select the best quality, most appropriate product for your specific application.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Applied Automation (UK) Ltd

Eastern Wood Road, Plymouth, Devon, PL7 5ET, GB
Last Update: 2026-03-19
Between 750 and 799
http://www.appliedautomation.co.uk

Applied Automation (UK) Ltd specialises in automation and control solutions, systems and products for manufacturing, the marine sector and smart homes. Customisation is at the heart of our business, we are customer focused and proud of our reputation for good service. The company has seven divisions with specialist teams in industrial engineering solutions, materials handling and factory systems, the technical distribution of industrial control and automation products, marine controls for luxury yachts, home automation, graphics and IT. We have two large manufacturing facilities and offices in Plymouth and a warehouse and distribution facility in Cardiff.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brendma-australia-p-l.jpeg
Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-automation-uk-ltd.jpeg
Applied Automation (UK) Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Applied Automation (UK) Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting in 2026.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Automation (UK) Ltd in 2026.

Incident History — Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Applied Automation (UK) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Automation (UK) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brendma-australia-p-l.jpeg
Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-automation-uk-ltd.jpeg
Applied Automation (UK) Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company and Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company.

In the current year, Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company and Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company nor Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company nor Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company nor Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company employs more people globally than Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brendma Australia Pty Ltd t/as BMA Belting nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References